PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
NARS Powermatte Lipstick

NARS · Lipstick

NARS Powermatte Lipstick

Excellent

Lower risk for standard cosmetic without PFAS triggers, though brand makes no transparency claims.

Verdict: BuyStandard lipstick with no established safety red flags; NARS lacks transparency but product poses minimal ingestion risk for occasional use.

This traditional matte lipstick contains no confirmed water-resistant or special durability coatings that would prompt PFAS inclusion. NARS does not state PFAS policy or testing, and the formula avoids marketed durability claims beyond matte finish.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Pigments, waxes, oils in standard lipstick base

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🪨

Talc contamination (asbestos trace)

Product is not labeled talc-free, suggesting talc is likely present as a slip agent. Talc mining and processing in regulated supply chains is monitored for asbestos, but historical contamination has occurred. Lip application poses minimal risk compared to inhaled talc; dermal absorption is negligible.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitivizers

Lipstick typically contains fragrance compounds (not all disclosed individually on labels, only as 'fragrance'). Repeated lip contact may sensitize susceptible individuals to allergens like limonene or linalool. Risk is low for most users but higher for those with fragrance sensitivity or atopic dermatitis on lips.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
🧠

Lead

NARS uses approved synthetic iron oxides and FD&C approved colorants. No recalls or testing reports indicate contamination. Ingestion risk from occasional lipstick use is negligible even if trace metals were present, given the small amount swallowed and low bioavailability from the wax matrix.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

1,4-dioxane in emulsifiers

NARS formulations do not list 1,4-dioxane-generating emulsifiers as primary ingredients based on public ingredient disclosure. This hazard is more relevant to foaming cleansers than solid lipsticks; the risk is theoretical rather than established.

95/ 100

Coating degradation and oil leaching over time

Powermatte formulas are stable wax-oil systems unlikely to degrade into harmful byproducts. Oil separation (common in old lipsticks) is cosmetic, not toxic, though oxidized oils may cause irritation in sensitive users.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Powermatte Lipstick uses a wax and oil base (typical ingredients: carnauba wax, isododecane, dimethicone) with synthetic iron oxide pigments and possibly mica for texture. Lipsticks are ingested in small amounts during wear, so pigment safety and absence of toxic heavy metals are the primary concern. The 'powermatte' finish suggests a higher proportion of talc or silica to create dry coverage, which is chemically stable when applied topically.

The brand's record and disclosure

NARS publishes ingredient lists on product pages and maintains standard cosmetics compliance (FDA, EU regulations) but does not voluntarily disclose heavy metal testing results or provide third-party certifications. The brand has no widely documented safety recalls or controversies specific to this product line. Silence on metal testing and talc sourcing is typical for mainstream prestige cosmetics rather than a NARS-specific concern.

How it compares in its category

Powermatte Lipstick sits in the mid-to-premium segment and is formulated similarly to competitors (MAC, Charlotte Tilbury, Fenty Beauty). Most lipsticks in this tier use synthetic iron oxides rather than natural pigments, reducing contamination risk from artisanal sources. NARS does not claim talc-free status, which aligns with industry norm but differs from talc-free-marketed competitors; actual talc contamination with asbestos is rare in regulated markets but remains a theoretical concern.

If you buy it

Store at room temperature away from heat; lipstick can soften or discolor above 35°C (95°F). Replace every 12-18 months or if color/scent changes, which signals degradation of oil components. Avoid prolonged contact with broken skin; lipstick is not intended for internal use, so swallowing small amounts during eating is not a toxicity pathway. If you have talc sensitivity or family history of ovarian concerns, consider talc-free alternatives, though lip application carries negligible systemic exposure risk.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
NARS has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More lipstick grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.