PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
10 In Nonstick Frying Pan in Green

Neelam Foodland · Cookware

10 In Nonstick Frying Pan in Green

Bad

Skip until Neelam Foodland discloses the coating.

Verdict: SkipUnknown nonstick coating chemistry and silent brand stance on PFAS create uncertainty; safe use depends entirely on avoiding high heat and monitoring coating integrity.

Neelam Foodland says nothing about the nonstick coating formula or PFAS levels. Most nonstick cookware has Teflon-family coating that could carry PFAS.

The safe swap

Lodge Cast Iron Skillet

Lodge

Lodge Cast Iron Skillet

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nonstick coating, type unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (thermal decomposition)

If the coating is Teflon-type coating-based (likely but unconfirmed), overheating above 500F can release toxic fumes. Neelam's lack of specification makes it impossible to determine whether the coating has known safety limits or thermal stability data.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle release

Budget nonstick coatings often have lower durability. Scratched or peeling coating can shed microparticles into food; long-term health effects of ingesting synthetic polymer particles are not fully characterized but are a documented concern in the nonstick cookware category.

20/ 100
🔩

Aluminum leaching

If the substrate is uncoated or thinly coated aluminum, acidic or high-salt foods can leach aluminum. The integrity of Neelam's coating application is unknown; poor coverage increases this risk.

70/ 100
🏷️

Incomplete disclosure of coating chemistry

The core hazard here is information asymmetry: without knowing the coating formula, you cannot make an informed risk decision. This lack of transparency is a documented weakness in the budget cookware segment.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No recalls or test failures for this brand's handles or trim have been documented. However, budget cookware from smaller manufacturers sometimes lacks heavy-metal screening in painted handles; independent testing of this specific model is not publicly available.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This pan uses an unspecified nonstick coating, which is the critical unknown. Nonstick coatings are typically Teflon-type coating-based (Teflon) or ceramic-polymer hybrids; Neelam Foodland has not disclosed which. The coating sits over what is likely aluminum or steel. Without knowing the exact chemistry, you cannot assess whether the coating will degrade safely or emit harmful fumes under stress.

The brand's record and disclosure

Neelam Foodland has no publicly documented certifications, independent safety testing, or transparency statements regarding coating composition or PFAS avoidance on record. The brand's silence on nonstick chemistry is typical of lower-cost cookware manufacturers and suggests minimal third-party scrutiny. No major recalls or contamination incidents are documented for this specific model, but absence of reporting does not confirm safety.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the budget-to-mid nonstick segment where coating formula opacity is common. Brands like OXO, GreenPan, and Caraway openly disclose ceramic or Teflon-type coating-free formulations; premium brands often provide independent lab certifications. Neelam's lack of disclosure is below the transparency standard now expected from mainstream cookware makers, even at lower price points.

If you buy it

Never exceed medium heat; nonstick coatings degrade and can release fumes at high temperatures, especially if the brand formula is older or unvetted. Inspect the coating monthly for scratches, flaking, or discoloration; replace the pan immediately if damage appears. Hand wash only; dishwasher use accelerates coating failure. Avoid metal utensils and abrasive scrubbers.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Neelam Foodland has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.