PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall8/ 100Bad
Tent Nemo Aurora Footprint

Nemo Equipment · Camping Tents & Tarps

Tent Nemo Aurora Footprint

Bad

Avoid until Nemo discloses its water-repellent coating treatment chemistry or commits to PFAS-free.

Verdict · SkipNylon footprint with undisclosed water-repellent coating poses PFAS uncertainty; no other acute hazards documented. Buy only if you accept unknown chemistry and contact Nemo for transparency.

Nylon footprint with a water-repellent coating, which historically rely on PFAS. Nemo does not disclose whether their Aurora uses legacy fluorinated water-repellent coating or newer alternatives.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon footprint with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Tent Nemo Aurora Footprint is made of, ingredients and materials

The Aurora Footprint is nylon fabric with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to the underside. water-repellent coating coatings are historically the primary source of PFAS (PFAS "forever chemicals") in outdoor textiles, though modern formulations vary widely. Nemo has not publicly disclosed whether this footprint uses legacy PFAS-based water-repellent coating or newer fluorine-free alternatives. Nylon itself is stable and poses no known leaching or off-gassing risk under normal use.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Standard nylon footprints commonly use PFAS-based water-repellent coating; Nemo's specific formulation is undisclosed, making PFAS presence unconfirmed but plausible.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

Water-repellent coating coatings degrade over time with washing and use; shedding particles are not documented as a health concern in field conditions, but prolonged contact with degraded coating residues is not well characterized.

70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth if wet-stored

If footprint is packed damp or stored in humid conditions, nylon can support mold growth; this is a use/storage issue, not a manufacturing hazard, but can pose respiratory concern if moldy fabric is handled indoors.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Chemical off-gassing from new material

Nylon footprints do not typically off-gas formaldehyde or other volatile organics; any odor on opening is normal residual processing and poses no established health risk.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Nemo footprints are typically neutral-colored nylon without reported heavy metal contamination in pigments; no recalls or safety alerts on record for this product.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Nemo Equipment has not issued a public PFAS policy or commitment to fluorine-free materials as of available records. The company does not list water-repellent coating chemistry on product pages or material safety documentation. This silence is notable given industry peers (e.g., Patagonia, some REI-brand tents) have moved toward PFAS-free water-repellent coating or published supplier standards. Without direct inquiry, you cannot confirm whether this footprint contains PFAS or next-generation alternatives.

How it compares in its category

Tent footprints across brands typically use nylon with water-repellent coating; the Aurora is standard in construction and durability. Competitors like Big Agnes, MSR, and REI Co-op footprints face the same PFAS uncertainty unless they disclose otherwise. Nemo's footprint is well-regarded for tear resistance and waterproofing performance, but transparency on chemistry is lagging relative to market leaders responding to consumer and environmental concern.

If you buy it

Contact Nemo directly and request specific water-repellent coating treatment information before purchase if PFAS exposure is a concern for you. Once in use, the footprint requires no special precautions; normal care (rinse dirt, air dry, avoid heat sources) will not mobilize coatings. Replace when the underside shows visible wear or water beads less effectively, typically after 3-5 years of season use. Store in a cool, dry place to extend water-repellent coating lifespan and minimize any potential degradation.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Nemo Equipment has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More camping tents & tarps grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.