Oakley · Ski & Snowboard Jackets
Oakley Men's Sub Temp RC Gore-Tex Jacket 2.0
Gore-Tex historically used PFAS; current formulation status unclear from public sources.
Gore-Tex waterproof jackets traditionally use Teflon-family coating membranes, historically associated with PFAS. Oakley has not publicly disclosed PFAS content or replacement technology for this model.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Gore-Tex membrane with water-repellent coating finish
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Oakley Men's Sub Temp RC Gore-Tex Jacket is made of, ingredients and materials
This jacket uses Gore-Tex membrane, a microporous polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon-type coating) laminate bonded to nylon or polyester shell fabric. Gore-Tex itself is stable under normal wear, but the critical issue is the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the exterior. Historically, Gore-Tex products used PFAS-based water-repellent coating coatings; Oakley has not publicly confirmed whether this 2.0 model uses legacy or reformulated water-repellent coating chemistry.
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
PFAS
Gore-Tex's historical water-repellent coating formulations used PFAS compounds. Oakley has not disclosed whether Sub Temp RC 2.0 uses legacy or reformulated chemistry. PFAS can leach from textiles through skin contact or laundry water, though skin exposure risk is lower than ingestion routes.
Source, ATSDR ↗Coating degradation and microplastic shedding
Water-repellent coating finishes on technical outerwear degrade over 2-3 years with washing. Degraded polymer coatings may shed microparticles, though quantification in this product category is limited. Risk increases if subjected to high heat during laundering or storage in direct sunlight.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Gore-Tex lamination and seam-tape application sometimes uses formaldehyde-based adhesives or resin finishes to bond layers. Off-gassing is typically minimal after initial manufacture, but prolonged storage in warm environments can accelerate residual release. No specific data on this model.
Source, ATSDR ↗Polyester shedding and synthetic fiber pollution
If the shell is 100% polyester (common in Gore-Tex constructions), washing sheds microfibers. Each wash releases 124-308 mg of synthetic fibers per garment. This is an environmental rather than personal-safety hazard, but relevant to lifecycle assessment.
What’s reassuring
Heavy metals
Oakley does not disclose dye chemistry for this jacket. Standard technical ski wear uses azo or reactive dyes with low migration risk, but cadmium and lead contamination is possible in low-cost dye batches. No recalls or testing results are public for this product.
Source, FDA ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Oakley (owned by Luxottica/EssilorLuxottica) does not maintain public transparency about PFAS use in apparel. The brand has no published PFAS phase-out commitment for ski wear comparable to some competitors. No major recalls or safety violations are on record for this specific model, but the absence of disclosure about water-repellent coating formulation is a red flag for informed purchasing.
How it compares in its category
Most major ski jacket brands now offer PFAS-free water-repellent coating options (Patagonia, Arc'teryx, The North Face) or publish transition timelines. Oakley's silence on water-repellent coating chemistry lags this trend. Gore-Tex membrane performance remains excellent, but you may find equivalent waterproofing and breathability from competitors with verified non-PFAS finishes at similar price points.
If you buy it
Contact Oakley customer service directly to confirm whether this 2.This model uses a water-repellent coating finish; check with the brand regarding PFAS content before purchasing. Wash separately in cold water with mild soap; avoid hot water or dryers, which can degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially accelerate any coating wear. Reapply non-PFAS water-repellent coating (Nixwax, Granger's) annually rather than relying on factory finish. Inspect seams and membrane for delamination or pilling yearly; Gore-Tex warranty typically covers defects but not water-repellent coating performance loss.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Oakley has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Oakley Men's Sub Temp RC Gore-Tex Jacket 2.0?
- Wool blend with synthetic fill (likely polyester)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
Allbirds
Jackets & Coats Allbirds Men's Trino Puffer Jacket Full Zip Wool Blend Forest Green Coat Size Sm
- wool blend (natural fiber dominant)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment - undisclosed chemistry
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Merino wool blend (natural fiber)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes and synthetic dye residue
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore ski & snowboard jackets grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.