15/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
OXO Good Grips Nonstick Pro 2-Piece Sheet Pan Set

OXO · Bakeware

OXO Good Grips Nonstick Pro 2-Piece Sheet Pan Set

F · High PFAS

Skip until OXO discloses nonstick coating composition.

Verdict: SkipCarbon steel sheet pans with undisclosed nonstick coating pose moderate PFAS risk; non-PFAS hazards minimal if used properly and coating stays intact.

OXO does not specify what nonstick coating is used on these sheet pans. Without disclosure of Teflon-type coating or Teflon-family coating content, PFAS risk cannot be assessed from public information.

The safe swap

Staub 4-Piece Baking Dish Set

Staub

Staub 4-Piece Baking Dish Set

90/100 safety

A

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its A.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Carbon steel with nonstick coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

OXO Good Grips Nonstick Pro sheet pans are carbon steel cores with an applied nonstick coating of unspecified composition. OXO has not publicly disclosed whether this coating contains Teflon-type coating (Teflon) or alternative fluorinated compounds, or if it is fluorine-free. Carbon steel itself is inert and safe; the hazard profile depends entirely on the coating type, durability, and manufacturing process used.

The brand's record and disclosure

OXO (owned by Groupe SEB) has not published technical data sheets or safety certifications detailing the nonstick coating chemistry for this product line. The brand does not maintain a public PFAS or fluorine-free product directory. No widespread recalls or safety warnings specific to OXO nonstick cookware have been documented in major consumer safety databases, but the absence of transparency limits independent verification of PFAS content.

How it compares in its category

OXO nonstick sheet pans occupy the mid-market segment with moderate durability claims. Competitors offering full transparency include GreenPan (ceramic coatings, Teflon-type coating-free), Our Place (ceramic hybrid), and Caraway (proprietary Teflon-type coating-free formula). Traditional uncoated carbon steel and stainless steel sheet pans eliminate coating longevity and composition concerns entirely but require seasoning and higher skill. OXO's positioning relies on convenience rather than disclosed safety credentials.

If you buy it

Avoid preheating above 400F (204C) empty, as nonstick coating degradation risk rises sharply at higher temperatures. Use silicone or wooden utensils only; metal tools scratch and accelerate coating failure. Hand-wash with mild soap rather than dishwasher, which degrades nonstick coatings faster. If coating visibly flakes, peels, or becomes slick uneven after 2-3 years, replace the pans; continued use of degraded coating may increase exposure to coating particulates.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Teflon-type coating fume risk (thermal degradation)

If coating is Teflon-type coating-based, heating above 500F (260C) can release polymer fumes; OXO has not confirmed coating type, making risk assessment incomplete. Consumer adherence to safe temperature use is the primary mitigation.

Likely

Coating degradation and particle shedding

All applied nonstick coatings degrade with time and use. As the OXO coating chips or flakes, fragments may be ingested or inhaled; the extent and composition of shed particles cannot be determined without disclosure of coating formula.

None known

Lead or cadmium in coating pigments

No public recalls or test reports have identified lead or cadmium in OXO nonstick cookware coatings. Carbon steel substrate itself is not a source of these metals under normal use.

None known

Aluminum leaching

These pans are carbon steel, not aluminum; aluminum leaching is not a concern for this product.

Reported

Coating adhesion and delamination

Online consumer reports document uneven nonstick wear and occasional coating bubbling or peeling after 1-3 years of use. OXO has not published durability benchmarks or warranty terms addressing coating failure.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Bakeware

Staub 4-Piece Baking Dish Set

Staub

4-Piece Baking Dish Set

enameled cast iron

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, enameled cast iron baking dishes without nonstick coating.

Risky category by default

Staub Sesame 3 pcs Rectangular Baking Dish Set

Staub

Sesame 3 pcs Rectangular Baking Dish Set

enameled cast iron (dark enamel coating)

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower concern. Enameled cast iron rarely uses PFAS, but brand is silent.

Risky category by default

Staub 2-Piece Ceramic Rectangular Baking Dish Set

Staub

2-Piece Ceramic Rectangular Baking Dish Set

Ceramic baking dish, uncoated

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower PFAS concern; ceramic baking dish with no known coatings.

Risky category by default

More bakeware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.