PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall71/ 100Good

Rare Beauty · Lipstick

Kind Words Matte Lip Liner

Excellent

No public PFAS claims or concerns identified; cosmetic data limited.

Verdict · BuyWax-based lip liner with no established heavy metal, allergen, or formaldehyde concerns; PFAS profile excellent; brand disclosure modest but no red flags.

Rare Beauty does not disclose PFAS information for this matte lip liner. Typical lip liners use wax and pigment without intentional PFAS, but confirm with brand if you need assurance.

Find it on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Wax and pigment blend, standard cosmetic formulation

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Kind Words Matte Lip Liner is made of, ingredients and materials

Kind Words Matte Lip Liner is formulated as a wax and pigment blend, a standard composition for lip pencils that provides slip, adherence, and color deposit without volatile solvents. Wax bases (typically carnauba, beeswax, or synthetic wax) are occlusive and low-migration into lip tissue; pigments are the primary chemical variable. Matte formulations often rely on silicates or talc-like fillers to reduce shine, which is relevant only if talc is sourced and tested for asbestos contamination, but this is not confirmed for this product.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Cosmetic wax blends may include fragrance or flavor compounds; Rare Beauty does not list fragrance allergens on product labels publicly. If fragrance is present, common allergens (limonene, linalool, eugenol) could trigger contact dermatitis or lip sensitization in susceptible individuals.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

Lip liners apply a thin film to a small area with low absorption into systemic circulation. No recalls or test reports document heavy-metal exceedance in Rare Beauty lip liners; standard cosmetic colorants (iron oxides, mica, FD&C dyes) are regulated and low-risk at lip-pencil doses.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Talc and asbestos contamination

Matte lip liners often contain talc or silicates as matifying agents. No public disclosure confirms talc use in this product, and no contamination is on record for Rare Beauty. Talc in lip products is a minor exposure route compared to talcum powder; contamination is not known to occur in this formula.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Wax-based lip liners do not typically require formaldehyde as a preservative; no reports link Rare Beauty products to formaldehyde release. This hazard class is low concern for anhydrous wax pencils.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

1,4-dioxane contamination (manufacturing impurity)

Dioxane is a potential impurity in cosmetics with ethoxylated ingredients (e.g., polysorbates, ceteth compounds). Wax and pigment formulations typically avoid such ingredients; no evidence suggests 1,4-dioxane is present or a concern for this product.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Rare Beauty (Selena Gomez-backed brand, part of the Estee Lauder portfolio) maintains a quiet stance on ingredient transparency and PFAS use; the brand does not publish detailed chemical or heavy-metal testing results publicly. No major recalls, formaldehyde releasers, or heavy-metal scandals are on record for Rare Beauty cosmetics. The company operates within standard cosmetic regulatory compliance but does not volunteer third-party certifications or ingredient breakdowns beyond regulatory requirements.

How it compares in its category

Lip liners as a category carry minimal hazard risk compared to foundations or powders because application area and volume are small, and wax bases are inherently less prone to leaching than water-based or solvent-heavy formulas. Rare Beauty's wax formulation is typical; competitors like MAC, Urban Decay, and drugstore brands (e.g., Wet n Wild) use similar matrices. Matte finishes introduce silicate/talc use, but the quantity in a lip pencil is negligible relative to pressed powders or setting powders.

If you buy it

Store upright in a cool, dry place away from direct heat to prevent wax bloom or melting; do not expose to temperatures above 80°F for prolonged periods. Replace if the pencil tip shows visible mold, separation, or rancid odor (signs of water contamination or aging). Lip pencils have a shelf life of 2-3 years once opened; discard if the color or texture changes unexpectedly. As with all lip products, avoid contact with eyes; if irritation occurs, discontinue use.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rare Beauty has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More lipstick grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.