Reynolds · Bakeware
4 pack Reynolds Kitchens Non-Stick Disposable Aluminum Baking Pans with Lids, Blue, 13 x 9 in.
Skip until Reynolds discloses non-stick coating chemistry.
Reynolds does not specify the non-stick coating type on this product. Aluminum baking pans with undisclosed coatings carry PFAS risk; look for brands that explicitly state Teflon-type coating-free or provide coating details.
The safe swap
Staub
Staub 4-Piece Baking Dish Set
90/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its A.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
aluminum with unspecified non-stick coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
Why this grade
Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed
Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.
Category baseline
cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
These are thin-gauge aluminum sheets with an applied non-stick coating of unspecified chemistry. Reynolds does not publicly disclose whether the coating is Teflon-type coating-based (traditional Teflon), ceramic, silicone, or another formulation. Aluminum itself is generally safe for food contact at normal cooking temperatures, but the coating's stability and thermal tolerance determine actual safety. The disposable format means single-use lifespan, which reduces exposure to coating wear and leaching from repeated use.
The brand's record and disclosure
Reynolds maintains silence on non-stick coating ingredients and PFAS content despite industry-wide pressure for transparency. The company has not published independent testing, third-party certifications (e.g., GreenGuard), or formal statements on PFAS-free status. This lack of disclosure is common among legacy cookware brands and reflects a business choice to avoid regulatory scrutiny rather than a commitment to safety transparency.
How it compares in its category
Disposable aluminum pans occupy a low-cost, single-use niche distinct from durable cookware. They typically underperform durable stainless steel or cast iron in safety transparency, but the one-time exposure window is shorter than reusable products. However, they generate more waste and may expose users to coating off-gassing during initial heating, which durable pan users mitigate through proper seasoning and maintenance protocols.
If you buy it
Use these pans for their intended single-service purpose (baked goods, takeout, gifting) and replace immediately after use. Do not reuse if coating shows visible wear, scratches, or discoloration. Avoid temperatures above 400 degrees Fahrenheit (204 Celsius) on first use to minimize potential thermal breakdown of the non-stick layer. Do not store food in these pans; transfer contents to storage containers within 2 hours of cooling.
Beyond PFAS: other things we checked
Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”
Teflon-type coating (Teflon) fume risk if coating is traditional Teflon-family coating
If the non-stick coating is Teflon-type coating-based and exposed to temperatures above 500 degrees Fahrenheit, degradation products may off-gas. Reynolds has not disclosed coating type, so Teflon-type coating-specific risk cannot be ruled out. Single-use format and typical oven temperatures (350-400 degrees) make this a low-probability but non-zero exposure scenario.
Aluminum leaching
Bare aluminum can leach into acidic or alkaline foods; however, the non-stick coating should provide a barrier. No recalls or public health warnings specific to Reynolds baking pans for aluminum migration have been documented. Risk remains largely theoretical under normal use.
Coating degradation and particle shedding over time
Thin applied coatings on disposable pans are inherently less durable than factory-integrated non-stick surfaces. Mechanical wear from pan handling, storage, or reuse (if user ignores single-use recommendation) could release coating particles. No specific product recalls exist, but this is a known failure mode for budget aluminum cookware.
Thermal stability of undisclosed non-stick formulation
Without ingredient disclosure, the thermal tolerance and chemical stability of the coating at high oven temperatures cannot be independently verified. Reynolds provides no temperature guidelines specific to this product, increasing user risk of accidental overheating.
Lid material and seal integrity unknown
The product includes lids, but Reynolds does not specify their material (plastic, cardboard laminate, aluminum). If plastic, BPA or phthalate content is possible but undocumented. Single-use format mitigates repeated contact exposure.
What we don’t know
This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 35% confidence. It is not a lab result.
No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.
The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.
Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.
Safer alternatives in Bakeware
Staub
4-Piece Baking Dish Set
enameled cast iron
Lower PFAS concern, enameled cast iron baking dishes without nonstick coating.
⚠Risky category by default
Staub
Sesame 3 pcs Rectangular Baking Dish Set
enameled cast iron (dark enamel coating)
Lower concern. Enameled cast iron rarely uses PFAS, but brand is silent.
⚠Risky category by default
Staub
2-Piece Ceramic Rectangular Baking Dish Set
Ceramic baking dish, uncoated
Lower PFAS concern; ceramic baking dish with no known coatings.
⚠Risky category by default
More bakeware grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.