15/ 100
F
OverallF0/100
Reynolds Bakeware Cookie Sheets

Reynolds · Bakeware

Reynolds Bakeware Cookie Sheets

F · High PFAS

Skip until coating composition is disclosed.

Verdict: SkipSteel cookie sheets with unidentified nonstick coating pose unknown PFAS risk; use with caution until Reynolds discloses coating chemistry.

Reynolds does not disclose the nonstick coating type or PFAS status. Steel bakeware typically uses Teflon-family coating coatings, which may contain PFAS, but brand transparency is absent.

The safe swap

Staub 4-Piece Baking Dish Set

Staub

Staub 4-Piece Baking Dish Set

90/100 safety

A

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned its A.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Steel with unspecified nonstick coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

Why this grade

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

Hurts the grade

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

Hurts the grade

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

Hurts the grade

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Reynolds Bakeware Cookie Sheets are steel substrates with an unspecified nonstick coating applied to the surface. The steel base itself is chemically stable and food-safe, but the nonstick layer is the critical unknown: it could be Teflon-type coating-based (potential fume risk if overheated), ceramic, silicone, or another polymer formulation. Without manufacturer disclosure of the coating type and fluorine content, users cannot assess degradation risk or heating safety thresholds.

The brand's record and disclosure

Reynolds is a subsidiary of Berry Global and has not publicly committed to PFAS-free cookware or disclosed nonstick coating composition for this product line. The company has not released voluntary safety certifications (such as GOTS, Oeko-Tex, or NSF food-contact compliance statements) specific to these cookie sheets. This silence on fluorinated compound use is a significant gap compared to competitor transparency on nonstick chemistry.

How it compares in its category

Most nonstick bakeware on the market uses either Teflon-type coating (Teflon, associated with PFOA/PFAS legacy), ceramic coatings, or proprietary Teflon-family coating. Reynolds' refusal to specify places this product in a higher uncertainty tier than brands like GreenPan or Caraway, which explicitly market fluorine-free alternatives. Uncoated steel or cast iron sheets eliminate nonstick coating hazards entirely, though they require more maintenance.

If you buy it

Use at moderate oven temperatures (under 400-450°F, well below the fume-off point of most nonstick coatings) to minimize degradation. Do not preheat an empty pan on stovetop. Hand-wash rather than machine-wash to extend coating life; dishwasher detergent and high heat accelerate peeling. Replace sheets immediately if coating visibly flakes, chips, or shows signs of wear. Store in a dry location to prevent rust at steel edges.

Beyond PFAS: other things we checked

Established hazard classes for this product type, assessed from public information. These never change the PFAS grade; a Likely flag caps the Verdict at “Buy with care.”

Possible

Nonstick coating degradation and fume release

Unidentified nonstick coating may degrade if overheated or scratched. If Teflon-type coating-based, overheating above 500°F can release Teflon-family coating fumes (polymer fume fever); ceramic or silicone alternatives carry lower risk but performance data is unavailable.

Possible

Coating flaking and microparticle ingestion

Worn or damaged nonstick surfaces can shed particles into food. Steel substrate does not leach, but coating fragments may be consumed if sheet damage goes unnoticed.

None known

Steel corrosion and rust

Reynolds cookie sheets are stainless or mild steel; stainless steel does not rust. Mild steel edges may corrode if exposed to moisture, but this is a structural durability issue, not a food-contact safety hazard.

None known

Heavy metals in coating (lead, cadmium)

No recalls or published testing has identified lead or cadmium contamination in Reynolds nonstick coatings. Modern food-contact coatings are regulated by FDA, but independent verification of this specific product is not on record.

Reported

Fluorinated compound (PFAS) exposure

Reynolds has not disclosed whether this coating contains PFAS. Nonstick coatings historically used PFOA and other legacy fluorochemicals; many manufacturers have phased these out but do not always communicate substitutes to consumers. This product's PFAS status remains unconfirmed.

What we don’t know

This grade is a model-based estimate from public materials, coatings, and brand disclosure at 45% confidence. It is not a lab result.

No independent PFAS lab test is on record for this exact product. A lab test could move the score in either direction.

The brand has not made a specific, verifiable PFAS-free statement, so part of this score reflects that missing disclosure rather than a confirmed material.

Formulations and coatings change between production runs. Always check the current label before buying.

Safer alternatives in Bakeware

Staub 4-Piece Baking Dish Set

Staub

4-Piece Baking Dish Set

enameled cast iron

A
C
PFASAll
A · Very low PFAS2 flags

Lower PFAS concern, enameled cast iron baking dishes without nonstick coating.

Risky category by default

Staub Sesame 3 pcs Rectangular Baking Dish Set

Staub

Sesame 3 pcs Rectangular Baking Dish Set

enameled cast iron (dark enamel coating)

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower concern. Enameled cast iron rarely uses PFAS, but brand is silent.

Risky category by default

Staub 2-Piece Ceramic Rectangular Baking Dish Set

Staub

2-Piece Ceramic Rectangular Baking Dish Set

Ceramic baking dish, uncoated

D
F
PFASAll
D · Elevated2 flags

Lower PFAS concern; ceramic baking dish with no known coatings.

Risky category by default

More bakeware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.