Spyder · Ski & Snowboard Jackets
Spyder Men's Rival Jacket
Likely has water-repellent coating treatment; PFAS status unknown, no brand disclosure.
Spyder jackets typically feature water-repellent coating finishes common in ski wear, which often contain PFAS. Spyder provides no public PFAS information or testing data.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Polyester shell with water-repellent (water-repellent coating) treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement about PFAS in this product.
PFAS
Spyder has not disclosed the water-repellent coating chemistry used on the Rival Jacket. Industry convention and the brand's silence suggest conventional fluorinated water-repellent coating (C8 or legacy PFOA-related compounds) is probable, though PFAS-free alternatives do exist and are not ruled out. This is graded separately but reinforces the 'care' tier.
Source: ATSDR ↗Microfiber shedding
Polyester garments release microfibers during washing and wear; this is inherent to the material class, not specific to Spyder. The rate is minimized by washing in cold water, using a gentler cycle, and washing less frequently. This is a water pollution concern, not a direct wearer hazard.
What’s reassuring
Formaldehyde / VOCs
No public recalls, reports, or testing data link formaldehyde finishes to Spyder Rival Jackets. Polyester apparel typically carries lower formaldehyde risk than cellulose-based fabrics, though dyes and finishing processes can introduce trace amounts. No evidence suggests this model exceeds typical safety thresholds.
Source: ATSDR ↗Heavy metals
Spyder does not disclose dye chemistry for the Rival Jacket. No recalls or documented contamination have been publicly reported for this brand's apparel. Standard textile industry regulations in North America and Europe restrict banned azo dyes, but without independent testing, specific assurance is not available.
Source: FDA ↗Flame retardants
The Rival Jacket is outerwear, not bedding or furniture, and is not subject to U.S. flammability standards requiring flame retardant treatments. No evidence indicates Spyder applies flame retardants to this model unprompted.
Source: EPA ↗The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
The Spyder Rival Jacket shell is polyester, a synthetic polymer that itself is chemically stable and does not leach during normal wear. However, the water-repellent (water-repellent coating) finish applied to polyester is the critical variable here. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on PFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS) to achieve durable water resistance, and Spyder has not publicly disclosed which water-repellent coating chemistry they use on this model. Polyester fibers can shed microfibers during washing, though this is a laundering practice issue, not a material defect unique to this jacket.
The brand's record and disclosure
Spyder maintains a largely silent stance on PFAS use and water-repellent coating chemistry across its product line. The brand has not published PFAS-free commitments, material transparency reports, or third-party testing disclosures readily available to consumers. This absence of communication is notable in an industry where competitors like Patagonia and The North Face have begun disclosing non-fluorinated water-repellent coating alternatives or phasing timelines. Without official clarification from Spyder, the assumption that this jacket carries a conventional PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatment is reasonable given industry norms as of the last major product releases.
How it compares in its category
Water-repellent outerwear is standard across ski and technical apparel brands. Spyder competes in the mid-to-premium segment where water-repellent coating treatment is nearly universal. Many competitors now offer PFAS-free or PFAS-reduced water-repellent coating options, though adoption remains inconsistent and often not advertised prominently. Jackets without any water-repellent coating treatment exist but are rare in this category and sacrifice the intended water-shedding function; this Rival model appears to prioritize performance over disclosed chemical transparency.
If you buy it
Wash the jacket in cold water with mild detergent; hot water and heavy detergents can degrade the water-repellent coating faster. Air dry or use very low heat only; high heat can damage both the polyester and the water-repellent coating layer. Expect water-repellent coating performance to decline after 20-30 washes; professional water-repellent coating re-treatment is available but will reintroduce fluorinated chemistry unless you specifically request PFAS-free alternatives. Avoid prolonged contact with skin irritants like heavy perspiration without rinsing, though the fabric itself poses minimal dermal risk under normal conditions.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Spyder has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Safer alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets
Patagonia
Women's Untracked Jacket
recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment
PFAS
Limited concern
Microplastics
Moderate concern
Coating degradation and leaching
Limited concern
Lightweight jacket with water-repellent coating finish.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
More ski & snowboard jackets grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.