The Best Non-Toxic Slow Cooker Liners of 2026

We scored 15 slow cooker liners for PFAS forever chemicals and other hazards, then ranked them safest first. The top pick is If You Care Slow Cooking Liners at 100/100. Every score below links to the full breakdown of what earned it.

How to read these scores. PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Each grade is a model-based assessment built from published ingredient lists, materials, certifications, brand disclosures, recalls and third-party lab results where they exist. Read the full rubric to see exactly what adds and removes points.
93% of the 15 slow cooker liners we scored fail our PFAS and toxin screen.
PFAS Authority, September 2026. Free to cite with a link. See the full dataset.

The safest PFAS-free slow cooker liners we have scored

  1. 1
    Slow Cooking Liners

    If You Care

    Slow Cooking Liners

    Unbleached parchment paper

    PFAS Grade100Excellent
    Overall Grade88Excellent

    Thermal degradation and smoke at high heat

    Limited concern

    70
    ⚠️

    Mold or bacterial growth if stored wet or damp

    Limited concern

    70
    🍂

    Adhesion failure and paper fragments in food

    Limited concern

    70

    Lower-concern option; parchment with verified PFAS-free certification.

    MADE SAFE Certified

    Risky category by default

The slow cooker liners we would skip

Lowest scoring in this category, worst first.

Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners

Reynolds

Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners

Plastic/polymer liner with unspecified nonstick or release coating

PFAS Grade15Bad
Overall Grade0Bad

Polymer thermal degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70
♾️

Nonstick coating leaching (Teflon-type coating/fluorinated alternatives)

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
🍳

Unlabeled additives in coating formulation

Moderate concern

45

Skip until Reynolds confirms coating details and PFAS status.

Nonstick, coating undisclosed

Reynolds Slow Cooker Liners

Reynolds

Slow Cooker Liners

Plastic film liner (composition unspecified)

PFAS Grade15Bad
Overall Grade0Bad
⚠️

Plasticizer and additive migration

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Unidentified additives (opacity agents, stabilizers)

Limited concern

70
🔥

Flame retardants

Moderate concern

45

Skip; zero material transparency prevents risk assessment.

Nonstick, coating undisclosed

Crock-Pot Kitchen Slow Cooker Liner

Crock-Pot

Kitchen Slow Cooker Liner

nylon or polyester liner with unspecified coating

PFAS Grade15Bad
Overall Grade0Bad
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (from unspecified nonstick coating)

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or fiber shedding

Limited concern

70
🍂

Coating delamination or degradation over time

High concern

20
🏷️

PFAS

High concern

20

Skip until Crock-Pot discloses coating chemistry.

Nonstick, coating undisclosed

What we check on slow cooker liners

  • Confirmed PFAS, PTFE or fluoropolymer content, which is the heaviest penalty we apply.
  • Stain, water or grease resistant treatments, which usually mean fluorinated chemistry.
  • Whether the brand discloses what is in the product, or stays silent behind a “clean” claim.
  • Independent lab results and certifications where they exist.

Full point-by-point rubric on the methodology page.

The slow cooker liners brands that will not say

6 of the brands here publish nothing about PFAS at all. Silence is not evidence of harm, but it is why none of them score well on disclosure.

Crock-Pot, Glad, Great Value, If You Care, Kroger, Reynolds.

Common questions about PFAS-free slow cooker liners

Is slow cooker liners PFAS free?

Mostly not. Of the 15 slow cooker liners we have scored, 93% fail our PFAS and toxin screen, which leaves 1 that pass. The highest scoring is If You Care Slow Cooking Liners at 100 out of 100. The lowest is Reynolds Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners at 15.

What is the safest slow cooker liners you have scored?

If You Care Slow Cooking Liners, at 100 out of 100, which we band as Excellent. It is unbleached parchment paper.

Which slow cooker liners should I avoid?

The three lowest scoring we hold are Reynolds Reynolds Kitchens Slow Cooker Liners at 15, Reynolds Reynolds Slow Cooker Liners at 15, Crock-Pot Crock-Pot Kitchen Slow Cooker Liner at 15. The problem with the first is that skip until Reynolds confirms coating details and PFAS status.

Which slow cooker liners brands will not say whether they use PFAS?

6 of the brands we scored in this category publish nothing about PFAS at all, including Crock-Pot, Glad, Great Value, If You Care, Kroger, Reynolds. Silence is not evidence of harm, but it is the reason those brands cannot score well on disclosure.

Do you lab test slow cooker liners?

No. We score from published ingredient lists, materials, certifications, disclosures and third party lab results where they exist. Where a product has been independently tested we use that result and say so.

Get the safe list, free

The products we score each week, and the safest alternative in every category.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Want to filter the whole category yourself? Browse all 15 slow cooker liners.