PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Puma Men's Fast-Trac NITRO 3 GTX

Puma · Running & Athletic Shoes

Puma Men's Fast-Trac NITRO 3 GTX

Bad

GTX waterproofing typical PFAS vector; Puma silent on chemistry.

Verdict: SkipGTX membrane carries elevated PFAS burden; otherwise low-risk synthetic upper. Puma transparency gap on chemistry warrants informed purchase with realistic expectations.

Puma does not disclose PFAS treatment on this shoe. Gore-Tex (GTX) membranes commonly use fluorochemicals for water resistance, though Gore has reduced legacy PFAS. No third-party verification available.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic textile with GTX waterproof membrane

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Gore-Tex's hydrophobic layer and factory water-repellent coating finish on synthetics typically contain long-chain fluorochemicals (PFOA, PFOS, or alternates). No independent testing of this specific model is on record, but all GTX footwear carries this risk unless explicitly labeled PFOA-free or water-repellent coating-free.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in synthetic fabric upper

Synthetic textile dyeing in footwear commonly uses azo dyes, some of which break down into carcinogenic aromatic amines. Puma does not disclose dye restrictions or testing; the dark colorway of this model increases likelihood of azo use. Risk is dermal contact during wear and hand-washing.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic textiles often receive wrinkle-resistant or anti-microbial finishes using formaldehyde releasers. No formaldehyde restriction is documented for Puma footwear. Off-gassing is minimal in typical wear but may occur during initial wear or in warm, humid conditions.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

Adhesive and glue off-gassing

Synthetic uppers are glued to the midsole and GTX layer. Polyurethane or solvent-based adhesives may off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during the first weeks of wear. Airing out the shoe indoors or outdoors for 24-48 hours before first use reduces exposure.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Antimony in polyester fiber

Polyester uppers may contain trace antimony (catalyst residue from polymerization). Industry-wide antimony levels in polyester are low and dermal absorption from finished textiles is negligible; no recalls or health reports exist for footwear in this category.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Fast-Trac NITRO 3 GTX uses a synthetic textile upper (likely polyester or nylon blend) bonded to Gore-Tex waterproof membrane. Gore-Tex's hydrophobic properties historically rely on fluorocarbon chemistry to repel water while allowing breathability, making it a known PFAS application. The shoe also contains synthetic rubber outsole and EVA midsole, which are chemically inert under normal wear; the risk concentrates in the GTX layer and any water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatments on the upper fabric itself.

The brand's record and disclosure

Puma has not published detailed chemical disclosure or restricted substance lists comparable to competitors like Adidas or Nike. The brand signed the 2011 Detox Campaign but has not committed to PFAS phase-out timelines or published progress reports. Puma does not advertise PFAS-free footwear lines or alternative waterproofing strategies, leaving buyers without clear guidance on chemistry or safer alternatives within their own catalog.

How it compares in its category

Most performance trail runners at this price point (approx 120 USD) pair synthetic uppers with either Gore-Tex, eVent, or proprietary membranes, all of which carry PFAS concerns. Some brands (Salomon, La Sportiva) now offer PFOS-free membranes or water-repellent coating-free options that trade some water resistance for lower chemical burden. The NITRO 3 GTX sits in the mainstream middle: durable waterproofing, but without the transparency or innovation of leading sustainability-focused competitors.

If you buy it

Wash the shoe by hand in cool water with mild detergent; avoid hot water or heat dryers, which can degrade the GTX bond. Reapply water-repellent coating annually if heavy use is planned, though this reintroduces fluorochemicals. Expect 300-500 miles of trail wear before midsole compression and outsole wear (not membrane failure) trigger replacement. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat; GTX can delaminate if exposed to sustained temperatures above 60 Celsius.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Puma has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Running & Athletic Shoes

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

New Balance

Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes and color-based toxins

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Limited concern

70

Standard athletic shoe with no known PFAS triggers, but no brand disclosure.

Risky category by default

Diadora Atomo V7000-2

Diadora

Atomo V7000-2

Textile fabric, likely polyester or nylon blend

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade49Poor
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic dyes

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fibers

Limited concern

70
💨

Adhesive and rubber off-gassing

Limited concern

70

No public PFAS disclosure; lower concern but unverified.

Risky category by default

More running & athletic shoes grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.