PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
PUMA Fast-Trac Nitro 4 Gore-tex Men's Waterproof Trail Running Shoes

Puma · Running & Athletic Shoes

PUMA Fast-Trac Nitro 4 Gore-tex Men's Waterproof Trail Running Shoes

Bad

Gore-tex waterproofing likely contains PFAS; Puma makes no disclosure.

Verdict: SkipGore-tex waterproofing contains PFAS (documented concern); other textile hazards minimal. Puma silent on PFAS; buy only if durability and resale justify environmental cost.

Gore-tex is a Teflon-family coating membrane historically treated with PFAS-based water-repellent coating. Puma provides no public statement on PFAS use or avoidance in this shoe.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Gore-tex membrane with textile upper, unspecified water-repellent coating treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Gore-tex waterproofing is documented to contain PFOA, PFOS, or other legacy/replacement PFAS. Puma's silence on water-repellent coating chemistry suggests unspecified fluorochemicals. PFAS leaches into soil and water during wear and care, and bioaccumulates in humans and wildlife.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in synthetic textiles

Polyester and nylon uppers may be dyed with azo dyes; some restricted azo dyes (those that cleave to carcinogenic amines) are banned in EU but not uniformly enforced in all Puma footwear. No GOTS, OEKO-TEX, or equivalent certification is visible for this model.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic textiles often receive formaldehyde-based finishes for shape retention and durability. Trail running shoes typically use low-emission formulations, but Puma does not disclose finishing chemistry for this model, and off-gassing risk is low after break-in.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

If the upper is polyester (likely), antimony trioxide may be present as a catalyst residue from fiber production. Levels in finished textiles are typically low, but migration into sweat during heavy use has not been ruled out for this specific shoe.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic uppers and sole

All synthetic athletic shoes shed microplastics during wear and laundry. Trail running shoes experience higher abrasion, accelerating shedding from the upper and midsole. Washing by hand slows this; machine washing accelerates it significantly.

45/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These shoes use Gore-tex membrane bonded to a textile upper, likely polyester or nylon blend. Gore-tex waterproofing requires fluorochemical treatment to repel water while remaining breathable; this treatment almost certainly involves PFAS compounds, which persist indefinitely in the environment and bioaccumulate. The unspecified water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating on the outer textile may contain additional PFAS or non-fluorinated alternatives, but Puma does not disclose which.

The brand's record and disclosure

Puma has not publicly committed to eliminating PFAS in footwear or published test results for this model. The brand has faced criticism from environmental groups for lagging behind competitors (Salomon, Danner, and others) in transparent PFAS phase-out timelines. Puma produces no visible sustainability certification or third-party testing data for the Fast-Trac Nitro 4 specifically.

How it compares in its category

Most waterproof trail running shoes at this price point use Gore-tex or similar fluorinated membranes; PFAS exposure is widespread in the category. Alternatives like Salomon QST and Danner Trail include explicit PFAS reduction or use of non-fluorinated membranes (e.g., eVent, Toray). Puma's silence on PFAS is a relative disadvantage among direct competitors offering greater transparency.

If you buy it

Wash only by hand with cool water and mild detergent to slow water-repellent coating and membrane degradation. Avoid heat exposure (dishwasher, dryers, direct sunlight) which can damage Gore-tex bonds and accelerate PFAS shedding into wastewater. Plan to resell or donate after 2-3 years of regular use; monitor the sole and gore-tex seams for peeling or separation, which signals end-of-life. Do not machine wash.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Puma has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Running & Athletic Shoes

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

New Balance

Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes and color-based toxins

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Limited concern

70

Standard athletic shoe with no known PFAS triggers, but no brand disclosure.

Risky category by default

Diadora Atomo V7000-2

Diadora

Atomo V7000-2

Textile fabric, likely polyester or nylon blend

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade49Poor
🎨

Azo dyes and synthetic dyes

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fibers

Limited concern

70
💨

Adhesive and rubber off-gassing

Limited concern

70

No public PFAS disclosure; lower concern but unverified.

Risky category by default

More running & athletic shoes grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.