34Poor

Ritz Review, Is Ritz Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 5 graded products, Ritz averages Poor (34/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. 1 of its products grade Good or better. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Worth buying from Ritz Good or better, safest first

Ritz Fresh Stacks Crackers

Ritz

Fresh Stacks Crackers

paperboard box, plastic sleeve

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade56Good
🫧

Microplastics

Degradation of plastic film under heat or mechanical stress can theoretically shed…

70
♾️

PFAS

Paperboard grease barriers in snack crackers often use PFAS-based coatings. While this is…

45

Packaged snack with minimal PFAS concern, but no brand transparency.

Risky category by default

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

Ritz Original Crackers

Ritz

Original Crackers

paperboard packaging with probable grease-resistant coating

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade3Bad
♾️

PFAS

Standard for paperboard food packaging in this product category. Mondelez does not…

20
🍳

Mineral oil or other coating transfer to product

Ritz crackers are pre-coated with vegetable oil, so additional mineral oil transfer from…

70

Standard food packaging with likely PFAS; manufacturer provides no disclosure.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Ritz Crackers Original

Ritz

Crackers Original

paperboard box with grease-resistant coating

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade21Bad
♾️

PFAS

Paperboard box interior likely uses Teflon-family coating-based water and oil repellent.…

70

Standard food packaging; grease resistance raises concern without disclosure.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Ritz Fresh Stacks Crackers Family Size

Ritz

Fresh Stacks Crackers Family Size

paperboard with polymer moisture/grease barrier

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Paperboard food packaging often uses PFAS-based fluorochemical coatings for water and…

70

Barrier degradation over time

Polymer coatings on paperboard can crack, flake, or degrade with age, humidity, or…

70

Skip until Ritz publicly discloses packaging PFAS content.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Ritz Crackers with Salt

Ritz

Crackers with Salt

paperboard with grease-resistant coating

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade3Bad
🍳

Grease-resistant coating migration

The fluorinated polymer coating on interior paperboard surfaces is designed to repel oil…

20
⚠️

Mineral oil or paraffin wax contaminants in paperboard

Recycled paperboard used in food packaging may contain residual mineral oils from…

70

Grease-resistant paperboard likely contains PFAS; no brand transparency.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →