Ritz Original Crackers
Standard food packaging with likely PFAS; manufacturer provides no disclosure.
Ritz Original comes in standard grease-resistant paperboard packaging typical of cracker boxes. The manufacturer does not disclose whether PFAS coatings were used.
The safe swap
Eco-Products
Eco-Products 12 oz. World Art Compostable Food Containers 25-ct. pack
100/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
paperboard packaging with probable grease-resistant coating
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.
No PFAS disclosure
The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
PFAS
Standard for paperboard food packaging in this product category. Mondelez does not disclose which PFAS compound is used, but fluorinated coatings are industry norm for oil-barrier protection in snack packaging.
Source: ATSDR ↗Mineral oil or other coating transfer to product
Ritz crackers are pre-coated with vegetable oil, so additional mineral oil transfer from packaging is unlikely to significantly alter product composition. However, the grease-resistant coating itself (PFAS) can migrate into oily foods at low levels over time.
What’s reassuring
Microplastics
No documented cases of visible coating flaking in Ritz packaging or recall history for particulates. Paperboard coating degradation is minimal under normal storage; risk increases only if packaging is visibly damaged or stored in extreme heat.
Source: EPA ↗BPA & bisphenols
Mondelez has not disclosed epoxy-based inks or adhesives in Ritz packaging. Contemporary paperboard food packaging typically avoids BPA, but no independent testing of Ritz packaging has been publicly released to confirm absence.
Source: FDA ↗Heavy metals
FDA regulations restrict lead and cadmium in printing inks on food-contact surfaces. No recalls or contamination reports specific to Ritz crackers or Mondelez paperboard packaging exist in public records.
Source: FDA ↗The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Ritz Original Crackers arrive in paperboard packaging with a grease-resistant interior coating to prevent oil from the crackers degrading the box. This coating is almost certainly a fluorinated compound (PFAS family) applied during manufacturing, though Ritz/Mondelez does not publicly disclose the specific chemical. The crackers themselves are a wheat flour, vegetable oil, and salt base with no documented hazardous additives in the product formulation.
The brand's record and disclosure
Mondelez International (Ritz owner) has not publicly committed to PFAS phase-out in food packaging, nor does it disclose PFAS use on product labels or sustainability reports. The company has faced no major recalls or documented chemical safety controversies specific to Ritz crackers. Mondelez maintains basic food safety certifications (FDA compliance) but remains silent on fluorinated coatings, which is standard industry practice for snack manufacturers.
How it compares in its category
Ritz crackers are packaged identically to most mass-market salty snacks (Doritos, Lay's, similar competitors), all of which rely on grease-resistant coatings that typically contain PFAS. No major competitor in this segment has switched to PFAS-free packaging. Unpackaged bulk crackers or those in uncoated paper eliminate coating exposure but are rare in retail and risk staleness. On coating hazard parity, Ritz is neither better nor worse than its direct peers.
If you buy it
Store the crackers in an airtight container once opened to preserve freshness and reduce packaging contact duration. Do not microwave or heat crackers inside the original packaging, as PFAS migration risk increases with temperature. The primary exposure route is indirect ingestion via oil transfer from coating to crackers; this is unavoidable with current packaging. Monitor expiration dates and replace packaging after 2-3 months of storage to limit extended grease-coating contact.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Ritz has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Safer alternatives in Food Packaging
World Centric
Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers
Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating
Proprietary coating chemical migration
Limited concern
Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix
Limited concern
Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods
Moderate concern
Recycling contamination if misdisposed
Limited concern
Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Vegware
Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box
Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings
Coating degradation under heat and moisture
Limited concern
Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Loliware
Compostable Hinged Deli Containers
Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings
PLA oligomer leaching
Limited concern
Microplastic generation on degradation
Limited concern
Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More food packaging grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.