Ritz Fresh Stacks Crackers
Packaged snack with minimal PFAS concern, but no brand transparency.
Fresh Stacks uses paperboard and plastic without typical PFAS-prone coatings. No PFAS claims exist, but standard cracker packaging carries minimal concern.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
paperboard box, plastic sleeve
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
No PFAS disclosure
The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.
Microplastics
Degradation of plastic film under heat or mechanical stress can theoretically shed microplastics; however, Fresh Stacks packaging is designed for low-temperature, low-moisture storage. Microplastic ingestion from cracker packaging under normal use is negligible.
Source: EPA ↗PFAS
Paperboard grease barriers in snack crackers often use PFAS-based coatings. While this is addressed separately in the PFAS grade, the mechanism involves fluorinated polymers that may persist in the environment post-disposal. Mondelez has not disclosed use or alternatives.
Source: ATSDR ↗What’s reassuring
Safe base material
Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.
BPA & bisphenols
Modern food-contact plastics in major snack brands have phased out BPA; Ritz uses polypropylene or similar non-polycarbonate materials that do not intentionally contain BPA or BPS. No reports of BPA detection in this product.
Source: FDA ↗Phthalate plasticizers
Phthalates are not used in rigid or semi-rigid food-contact plastics under FDA food contact substance guidelines. The plastic sleeve in Ritz Fresh Stacks is not formulated with phthalates.
Chlorine bleaching residues in paperboard
Paperboard used in food packaging is bleached during pulping; residual chlorine species are not a known contamination pathway in finished cracker packaging under FDA monitoring.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
Ritz Fresh Stacks are packaged in a paperboard box lined with a plastic sleeve, typical for shelf-stable snack crackers. The plastic liner is a barrier against moisture and oxygen; at room temperature, this material does not leach BPA, phthalates, or other plasticizers into dry food. Paperboard itself is inert under non-aqueous conditions and poses no leaching risk. The concern with such packaging is primarily PFAS in coatings (grease resistance) rather than the base polymers.
The brand's record and disclosure
Mondelez International (Ritz's parent company) has not published detailed transparency on PFAS or fluorinated coatings in snack packaging as of available public records. The company has made general sustainability commitments but remains silent on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance use in food-contact materials. No major recalls or contamination incidents are on record for Ritz crackers related to packaging migration.
How it compares in its category
Ritz Fresh Stacks sits at the industry standard for shelf-stable cracker packaging: paperboard exterior plus plastic sleeve. Competitor products (Cheez-It, Trident) use similar constructions. Unlike single-use plastic pouches, the cardboard outer layer reduces pure plastic contact surface, which modestly lowers potential chemical exposure compared to fully plastic-wrapped alternatives. However, all major snack manufacturers remain largely opaque on PFAS in grease-resistant coatings.
If you buy it
Store the box at room temperature away from direct heat or sunlight; no special handling is required. Do not microwave crackers in the sleeve or wrapper. The packaging is single-use; once opened, transfer uneaten crackers to an airtight container if storing longer than 1-2 weeks to maintain crispness. Recycling: check local programs for mixed-material (paperboard plus plastic) acceptability; many facilities cannot process the layered structure.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Ritz has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Safer alternatives in Food Packaging
World Centric
Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers
Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating
Proprietary coating chemical migration
Limited concern
Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix
Limited concern
Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods
Moderate concern
Recycling contamination if misdisposed
Limited concern
Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Vegware
Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box
Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings
Coating degradation under heat and moisture
Limited concern
Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
Loliware
Compostable Hinged Deli Containers
Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings
PLA oligomer leaching
Limited concern
Microplastic generation on degradation
Limited concern
Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.
✓Verified PFAS-free by a third party
More food packaging grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.