Under Armour Review, Is Under Armour Non-Toxic?
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
Across 1 graded product, Under Armour averages Bad (20/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.
Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
Under Armour
Men's Shorebreak 2 in 1 Amphib Shorts
Polyester blend with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish
PFAS
water-repellent coating treatment on polyester athletic wear commonly uses PFAS-based…
Microplastic shedding with wear and wash
All polyester textiles shed microfibers during washing. Frequency increases when…
water-repellent coating treatment likely contains PFAS.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →