By PFAS Authority · Updated October 9, 2026
Top grades to buy
MAC
Cosmetics Mac Nail Lacquer Polish Over-Accessorized (Pink Gold Glitter ) Boxed
MAC
Nail Lacquer
MAC
Nail Lacquer 10 ml / 0.34 oz ( CHOOSE
Model-based grades, not lab tests. We flunk more than we pass. How grading works
PFAS in Cosmetic Color Products, Which Brands Grade Best and Worst
Based on available materials and data, nail lacquers and color cosmetics from Sally Hansen and MAC currently grade highest in our database for lower PFAS-related concern, while a top-coat product from Butter London grades lowest. Sally Hansen's Xtreme Wear and Miracle Gel lines, along with several MAC nail lacquers, land in the "Excellent" tier at 75 out of 100 on our model-based safety estimate, meaning reviewed formulation disclosures and ingredient patterns show fewer PFAS-associated red flags than typical long-wear or "hardwear" color products.
No single brand sweeps every category, and this guide is not a certification of purity. These are model-based estimates built from materials and public disclosure, not laboratory test results, and a high grade should be read as "lower concern" rather than "PFAS-free" or "safe." If you want the full, continuously updated comparison across more formulas, run your own shade or SKU through the PFAS Authority product finder or browse the broader cosmetics category roundup and the dedicated makeup guide.
Summary comparison table
| Product | PFAS grade (model estimate) | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Sally Hansen Xtreme Wear Nail Color | Excellent, 75/100 | Lower concern based on reviewed materials |
| Sally Hansen Xtreme Wear Nail | Excellent, 75/100 | Lower concern based on reviewed materials |
| Sally Hansen Xtreme Wear Nail Color Polish | Excellent, 75/100 | Lower concern based on reviewed materials |
| Sally Hansen Miracle Gel Nail | Excellent, 75/100 | Lower concern based on reviewed materials |
| Sally Hansen New Lengths Nail Color Secrets | Excellent, 75/100 | Lower concern based on reviewed materials |
| Sally Hansen Mega Strength Nail | Excellent, 75/100 | Lower concern based on reviewed materials |
| MAC Nail Lacquer Polish Over-Accessorized (Pink Gold Glitter) Boxed | Excellent, 75/100 | Lower concern based on reviewed materials |
| MAC Studio Matte Overlacquer | Excellent, 75/100 | Lower concern based on reviewed materials |
| MAC Nail Lacquer Nail Polish Al Fredo | Excellent, 75/100 | Lower concern based on reviewed materials |
| MAC Nail Lacquer | Excellent, 75/100 | Lower concern based on reviewed materials |
| MAC Nail Polish, Quiet Time, Beige | Excellent, 75/100 | Lower concern based on reviewed materials |
| MAC Nail Lacquer 10 ml / 0.34 oz (Choose) | Excellent, 75/100 | Lower concern based on reviewed materials |
| Butter London Hardwear Shine UV Topcoat | Poor, 40/100 | Higher concern, avoid if minimizing PFAS exposure |
Why PFAS shows up in cosmetic color products
PFAS compounds, including fluorinated polymers like PTFE, have historically been used in nail lacquers, long-wear topcoats, and some pressed-powder color cosmetics to improve slip, leveling, and water or oil resistance. Long-wear "gel-effect" or "hardwear" topcoats are especially prone to carrying fluorinated film-formers because they are marketed on durability and chip resistance, which is exactly the performance profile PFAS chemistry was traditionally used to deliver. This is one reason our model treats high-durability topcoat claims as a flag worth scrutinizing rather than an automatic mark of quality.
Product-by-product breakdown
Sally Hansen Xtreme Wear Nail Color and related Xtreme Wear SKUs
Materials, Standard nitrocellulose-based lacquer system with film-forming resins and plasticizers, formulated for fast-drying wear. Brand claims, Sally Hansen markets Xtreme Wear on chip resistance and fast dry time; the company has not provided our team with a third-party verified PFAS-free lab certificate for this SKU, so any "free of" claims on packaging should be read as brand-stated rather than independently confirmed. Pros, Consistently grades Excellent (75/100) across multiple Xtreme Wear variants in our database, affordable, wide shade range. Cons, A high grade reflects lower concern based on reviewed materials and public disclosure, not a laboratory assay, so trace-level PFAS cannot be fully ruled out. See the Xtreme Wear Nail Color and Xtreme Wear Nail Color Polish listings for the full model breakdown.
Sally Hansen Miracle Gel Nail
Materials, Gel-effect lacquer designed to mimic UV gel finish without a lamp, using a two-step resin system. Brand claims, Marketed for extended wear and gel-like gloss; no third-party PFAS test data was available in the sources we reviewed. Pros, Grades Excellent (75/100), gel-like finish without salon UV curing. Cons, Gel-effect formulas as a category carry more durability-chemistry complexity than basic lacquers, so continued monitoring is warranted even at a high grade. Full details at Sally Hansen Miracle Gel Nail.
Sally Hansen New Lengths Nail Color Secrets and Mega Strength Nail
Materials, Strengthening lacquer formulas incorporating conditioning additives aimed at nail health claims alongside color. Brand claims, Positioned around nail strengthening and growth support rather than extreme durability, which generally correlates with simpler film-former chemistry. Pros, Both grade Excellent (75/100); strengthening positioning tends to reduce reliance on the fluoropolymer slip agents seen in hardwear topcoats. Cons, Still a model-based estimate, not a certified PFAS-free result; ingredient lists can change between batches. See New Lengths Nail Color Secrets and Mega Strength Nail.
MAC Nail Lacquer line, including Over-Accessorized and Al Fredo shades
Materials, Pigmented nitrocellulose lacquer base typical of prestige nail color, including glitter-finish variants like Over-Accessorized Pink Gold Glitter. Brand claims, MAC's marketing emphasizes pigment payoff and finish rather than specific PFAS-free claims; we found no brand-published third-party lab verification for these SKUs in the sources reviewed. Pros, Multiple MAC lacquer SKUs, including Over-Accessorized (Pink Gold Glitter) Boxed and Al Fredo, grade Excellent (75/100), suggesting a generally consistent formulation approach across the line. Cons, Glitter and metallic finishes sometimes require additional binder or suspension chemistry that is harder to audit from public ingredient lists alone, so the grade should be treated as directional, not definitive.
MAC Studio Matte Overlacquer
Materials, A matte-finish topcoat/lacquer hybrid intended to flatten gloss without heavy added texture. Brand claims, Marketed for a velvet matte look; MAC does not appear to publish independent PFAS testing for this product in the sources available to us. Pros, Grades Excellent (75/100), notable because matte topcoats can sometimes use different slip agents than glossy ones. Cons, As with all entries here, this is our model-based estimate from materials and public disclosure, not a lab test, so it should inform rather than replace personal risk tolerance. Details at MAC Studio Matte Overlacquer.
MAC Nail Lacquer, Quiet Time Beige, and 10 ml Choose variant
Materials, Standard-finish beige and neutral-tone lacquers from MAC's core nail color range, plus a multi-shade 10 ml format. Brand claims, No specific PFAS-free assertion found in reviewed brand materials; claims are limited to color and finish performance. Pros, Both grade Excellent (75/100), reinforcing that MAC's core lacquer base appears consistent across shades. Cons, Shade-to-shade pigment variation could theoretically introduce different additive packages not captured in our review. See Quiet Time, Beige and MAC Nail Lacquer 10 ml / 0.34 oz (Choose), as well as the general MAC Nail Lacquer listing.
Butter London Hardwear Shine UV Topcoat
Materials, A UV-cured hardwear topcoat formulated for high gloss and extended chip resistance, the performance category most associated with fluoropolymer use in nail products. Brand claims, Butter London has publicly stated a "7-Free" or similar "free-from" formulation position on parts of its range; however, we found no third-party verified lab data confirming the absence of PFAS specifically for this UV topcoat SKU, and the product's grade in our database does not support treating it as lower concern. Pros, Strong durability performance is the brand's core promise, and some users prioritize that trade-off. Cons, Grades Poor (40/100) in our model, the lowest grade in this product set, reflecting formulation and disclosure patterns more consistent with higher PFAS-related concern among hardwear-style topcoats. This is a model-based estimate from available materials, not a confirmed lab detection, but it is a meaningful gap relative to the Excellent-tier products above. Full listing at Butter London Hardwear Shine UV Topcoat.
What to avoid
- "Hardwear," "gel-shine," or extreme chip-resistance topcoats without disclosure. Durability-first marketing language has historically correlated with fluoropolymer slip agents. The Butter London Hardwear Shine UV Topcoat's Poor grade is the clearest example in our current dataset.
- Brand "free-from" claims with no third-party lab backing. A brand stating a product is PFAS-free is a brand claim, not independent verification, unless a named lab and test method are disclosed. Treat these claims as a starting point, not a conclusion.
- Products with vague or incomplete ingredient disclosure. Nail lacquers with proprietary "finish enhancer" or "flow agent" blends that don't specify polymer chemistry are harder to grade with confidence, and that uncertainty should weigh against them if minimizing PFAS exposure is a priority.
- Assuming any single Excellent grade applies brand-wide. Grades in this guide are SKU-specific model estimates. A different shade, finish, or formulation update from the same brand could carry a different score.
For related product categories where similar durability-driven PFAS use patterns show up, see our guides to lip balm and long-wear lipstick foundation and primer, and blush.
Our pick
Based on available materials and data, the Sally Hansen Xtreme Wear and Miracle Gel nail color lines, together with MAC's core Nail Lacquer range, represent the lower-concern end of the cosmetic color products we've reviewed, each landing in the Excellent tier at 75/100. None of these should be described as "PFAS-free" or "safe" outright. They reflect a model-based estimate built from formulation patterns and public disclosure, not a laboratory certification. If a specific shade or batch matters to you, check it directly through the product finder before purchase. At the other end, the Butter London Hardwear Shine UV Topcoat's Poor grade makes it the product in this set to deprioritize if reducing PFAS-associated exposure is your main goal, particularly given the category-wide tendency for hardwear topcoats to rely on fluorinated durability agents.
No claim in this guide should be read as a health guarantee. Any association between PFAS exposure and health outcomes discussed in public research is just that, an association, not proof of individual cause and effect. For a broader view of how color cosmetics compare to other product categories, visit the cosmetics and makeup roundups.
Frequently asked questions
Does an Excellent grade mean a nail polish is PFAS-free?
No. An Excellent grade of 75/100 reflects our model-based estimate from reviewed materials and public disclosure, indicating lower concern relative to other graded products. It is not a laboratory test result and should not be read as a certification that the product is PFAS-free or safe.
Why do long-wear topcoats like Butter London's Hardwear Shine grade lower?
Products marketed on extreme chip resistance and extended gloss historically relied more on fluoropolymer-based film formers to achieve that performance. Based on available materials and data, the Butter London Hardwear Shine UV Topcoat's Poor (40/100) grade reflects formulation and disclosure patterns consistent with higher PFAS-related concern in that product category, not a confirmed lab detection.
If a brand says its polish is PFAS-free, can I trust that claim?
Treat it as a brand-stated claim unless the company names an independent lab, test method, and date. Brand claims and third-party verified results are not the same thing, and in the products reviewed here, we did not find published third-party PFAS lab verification for the specific SKUs listed. For ongoing comparisons, check the PFAS Authority finder or the cosmetics category guide for updates.
Now check your own stuff
See every product we’ve graded in this category, best-graded first.
Get the graded list, free.
The products we score each week, and the best-graded alternative in every category.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.