PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall35/ 100Poor
Mac Cosmetics Makeup | Mac Nail Lacquer Polish Over-Accessorized (Pink Gold Glitter ) Boxed | Color: Gold/Pink | Size: 0

MAC · Cosmetic Color Products

Mac Cosmetics Makeup | Mac Nail Lacquer Polish Over-Accessorized (Pink Gold Glitter ) Boxed | Color: Gold/Pink | Size: 0

Excellent

Nail polish poses lower PFAS concern. No waterproofing claims on this product.

Verdict: Buy with careStandard nail lacquer with typical cosmetic hazard profile; MAC has no major recalls on record for this category. Use as directed with ventilation.

MAC nail lacquer is a standard cosmetic polish without water-resistant or stain-resistant treatments typically requiring PFAS. No public PFAS disclosure from the brand.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

nitrocellulose, plasticizers, pigments, resins

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and solvent inhalation

Nitrocellulose lacquers release toluene, xylene, and other VOCs during and shortly after application. Glitter formulas may require additional solvents for particle suspension, increasing cumulative VOC load. Exposure is acute during application and dissipates with ventilation but is not eliminated.

20/ 100
🧴

Phthalate plasticizers

MAC does not disclose whether this formula uses dibutyl phthalate (DBP) or newer alternatives. Industry trend is replacement, but without MAC's explicit statement, older formulations may still contain DBP, which is a reproductive health concern with chronic low-dose dermal exposure.

70/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

Gold and pink glitter pigments (likely iron oxides, titanium dioxide, or synthetic colorants) can carry trace lead or cadmium if sourcing is not rigorous. MAC does not publish heavy metal limits for nail lacquer. Risk is inhalation during application and absorption through abraded skin, not ingestion.

Source: FDA
70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Some lacquer resins (tosylamide/formaldehyde resin) release low levels of formaldehyde during cure and wear. MAC's formula disclosure does not confirm or exclude these; they are legal but a known contact allergen concern for frequent users and nail technicians.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

Microinhalation of glitter particles

Sparkle and glitter polishes shed fine particles during application, wear, and removal. While not classified as a major toxin, chronic inhalation of mica and synthetic particles may irritate respiratory tissue, especially for professional nail technicians with daily exposure.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

MAC Nail Lacquer is a solvent-based formula built on nitrocellulose film-former, plasticizers (likely dibutyl phthalate or modern alternatives), and synthetic/mica pigments for color and glitter effect. The glitter component in this specific shade introduces fine particles that pose inhalation risk during application if ventilation is poor. Nitrocellulose itself is not toxic when cured; hazard comes from volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released during application and from potential contaminants in pigment batches.

The brand's record and disclosure

MAC (Estee Lauder subsidiary) does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient sourcing, heavy metal testing limits, or formaldehyde-releaser content for nail lacquers, though the brand is regulated under FDA cosmetics rules. No major recalls or safety controversies specific to MAC nail lacquer have been established in public records. The brand markets 'professional' positioning but provides minimal transparency on solvent safety or phthalate replacement strategies compared to competitors like Zoya or Ella+Mila.

How it compares in its category

Standard three-component nail lacquer formulas (solvent, film-former, colorant) carry consistent low-to-moderate risk across mass-market brands. MAC sits mid-range: more rigorously manufactured than budget brands but less transparent and less reformulated away from classic solvents than premium indie or 'clean' lines. Glitter nail polishes across all brands pose slightly higher VOC and particulate exposure than solid colors due to suspension agents and particle load.

If you buy it

Apply in well-ventilated spaces (open window or fan) to minimize solvent vapor inhalation. Wear it for 7-14 days before removal; extended wear increases solvent absorption through the nail bed. Remove with acetone or non-acetone remover in ventilation; never use in enclosed bathrooms. Replace if formula thickens, separates, or smells rancid (sign of solvent degradation), typically after 2-3 years of storage. Pregnant individuals should consult their provider about exposure frequency.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
MAC has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cosmetic Color Products

MAC Studio Matte Overlacquer

MAC

Studio Matte Overlacquer

liquid cosmetic spray, alcohol and resin based

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
💨

Alcohol inhalation from spray

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Resin irritation on compromised skin

Limited concern

70

Low risk. No known PFAS triggers in this cosmetic spray.

Risky category by default

More cosmetic color products grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.