PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
FootJoy WeatherSof Golf Glove

FootJoy · Golf Balls & Equipment

FootJoy WeatherSof Golf Glove

Poor

Golf glove with water-repellent coating, PFAS risk unclear due to no disclosure.

Verdict · SkipCabretta leather glove with undisclosed water-resistant coating; no major hazards documented, but water-repellent coating chemical identity unclear and brand transparency lacking.

FootJoy WeatherSof uses water-resistant treated leather but provides no PFAS transparency. Most golf gloves use water-repellent coating finishes that commonly contain PFAS, though specific formula remains unknown.

The better-graded swap

ONCORE MIX 1 DOZEN RECYCLED GOLF BALLS Value (AAA)

OnCore

ONCORE MIX 1 DOZEN RECYCLED GOLF BALLS Value (AAA)

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Cabretta leather with water-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition

Acushnet does not disclose whether WeatherSof gloves use PFAS-based, fluorine-free, or hybrid water-repellent coating technology. Undisclosed coatings on skin-contact leather warrant caution, though migration risk from intact gloves is low compared to textiles.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and product replacement frequency

Water-resistant finishes on golf gloves degrade within 1-2 seasons; frequent replacement increases lifetime chemical exposure per use-hour. No data exists on degradation byproducts or whether breakdown releases coating monomers into sweat or environment.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Cabretta leather is conventionally chrome-tanned; no safety alerts exist for FootJoy gloves specifically. Residual chrome or formaldehyde levels in mainstream golf gloves are not publicly tested, but standards-compliant tanning poses negligible dermal risk.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

FootJoy does not disclose adhesive or finish formulations. Standard leather glove manufacturing typically avoids high-formaldehyde inputs, and no product-specific complaints are documented.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Cabretta is usually dyed with acid dyes (low azo content) and presents minimal sensitization risk. No color-specific safety data or dermatological warnings exist for this glove line.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

FootJoy WeatherSof uses Cabretta leather, a soft sheepskin commonly treated for water and sweat resistance in golf gloves. The water-resistant finish is the critical unknown, it is almost certainly a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating, which historically relied on PFAS compounds, though some modern formulations use fluorine-free or short-chain alternatives. Acushnet has not publicly disclosed the specific water-repellent coating chemistry, making independent assessment of non-PFAS hazards difficult. Cabretta leather itself poses minimal chemical risk if tanned conventionally, though chrome tanning is standard in this material class.

The brand's record and disclosure

Acushnet (FootJoy's parent) has not published a comprehensive chemical disclosure policy or PFAS phase-out timeline as of public records. The company remains silent on water-resistant coating formulations across its apparel lines. No major recalls or third-party safety alerts are on record for this specific glove model. This opacity is typical of mid-tier sports brands but contrasts with competitors (Titleist, Callaway) that have begun addressing sustainable chemistry in some product lines.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves universally require water-resistant or moisture-wicking treatments, making this a category where water-repellent coating coatings are nearly unavoidable. FootJoy's Cabretta leather construction is a premium choice compared to synthetic microfiber alternatives, which introduce microplastic and off-gassing risks instead. Most competitors at this price point use identical or similar undisclosed water-repellent coating systems. Gloves certified by OEKO-TEX or Bluesign (which restrict PFAS) are rare in golf but available from niche brands.

If you buy it

Wash gloves gently in cool water and allow air-dry; machine washing or heat exposure may degrade the water-resistant coating prematurely. Avoid prolonged contact with skin while wet, as residual coating chemicals could migrate onto hands, especially if glove is damaged or heavily used in heat. Replace gloves every 1-2 seasons or when water beading stops, as coating breakdown increases direct leather contact with sweat and contaminants. Store in a dry place away from direct sunlight to slow degradation of both leather and finish.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
FootJoy has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.