PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall43/ 100Poor
Aerie Horseshoe Ring Halter Full Coverage One Piece Swimsuit

Aerie · Swimwear

Aerie Horseshoe Ring Halter Full Coverage One Piece Swimsuit

Good

Lower concern for a standard swimsuit. No known PFAS treatment triggers, but Aerie silent.

Verdict · SkipStandard nylon-polyester swimsuit with no established safety red flags; PFAS profile acceptable for category; Aerie's silent stance a minor transparency gap.

This is a basic nylon-polyester one-piece with no reported water-repellent, stain-resistant, or specialized coatings. Aerie hasn't disclosed PFAS use or absence. Without evidence of water-repellent coating treatment or other finishing chemicals, risk is substantially lower than technical swimwear.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester blend swimsuit fabric

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Aerie Horseshoe Ring Halter Full Coverage is made of, ingredients and materials

This swimsuit is a nylon-polyester blend, the industry standard for performance swimwear. Nylon provides stretch and durability; polyester adds color retention and chlorine resistance. Neither material is inherently hazardous in swimwear form, though both are synthetic polymers that shed microfibers when laundered. The one-piece construction and full coverage reduce surface area that could degrade or shed fibers into water.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and color fastness

Nylon-polyester swimwear typically uses reactive or disperse dyes; no specific testing data for Aerie exists in public records. Risk of dye bleeding into water or skin is low under normal conditions but cannot be fully ruled out without batch-level disclosure.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding

All synthetic swimwear sheds microfibers in the wash. Nylon and polyester blends are among the worst offenders. A single wash can release hundreds of fibers; cumulative environmental impact is established, though direct health risk to wearer is negligible.

45/ 100
⏳

Elastic degradation and metal nickel content

Swimsuit elastics sometimes contain nickel-plated metal trim (fasteners, hardware). No known nickel incidents with Aerie swimwear, but patch testing is not publicly available. Risk is low unless direct skin contact with metal components occurs.

70/ 100
⏳

Chlorine interaction and fabric wear

Chlorine exposure degrades nylon and polyester over time, accelerating pilling, color loss, and elastic failure. This is material-level risk, not a manufacturing defect, and is inherent to pool use regardless of brand.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde release incidents reported for Aerie swimwear. Swimwear undergoes heavy laundering which typically removes residual resins; risk is minimal compared to apparel worn dry-cleaned or never washed.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Aerie (American Eagle's intimates/activewear brand) does not publicly disclose detailed chemical sourcing, dye safety, or PFAS treatment policies for swimwear, though the parent company has committed to some chemical transparency initiatives. No major recalls or safety controversies specific to Aerie swimwear are on public record. The silent stance on PFAS treatment is not unusual for mass-market swimwear brands but limits consumer confidence in water-repellency claims, if any.

How it compares in its category

Aerie swimwear sits in the mid-market segment, priced below premium technical brands (Speedo, Arena) and above budget alternatives. Material and construction quality are typical for this tier; no known performance or durability advantages or disadvantages versus comparable one-piece offerings. The lack of explicit certifications (OEKO-TEX, Bluesign) is standard for mainstream brands at this price point.

If you buy it

Rinse with fresh water after chlorine or saltwater exposure to reduce chemical buildup and extend life. Wash in cold water, gentle cycle, and air-dry to minimize microfiber shedding and preserve elastic. Replace when elastic fails or seams separate, typically after 1-2 seasons of regular use. Avoid prolonged exposure to direct sunlight or heat, which can degrade nylon and polyester faster.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Aerie has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Swimwear

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

More swimwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.