PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall43/ 100Poor
Aerie Pique Full Coverage One Piece Swimsuit

Aerie · Swimwear

Aerie Pique Full Coverage One Piece Swimsuit

Good

Lower PFAS concern. Standard swimwear with no water-repellent finish flagged.

Verdict · SkipNylon/polyester swimwear with no water-repellent coating carries lower chemical risk; standard category performance without brand red flags.

Aerie's one-piece is primarily nylon and polyester, materials not inherently dependent on PFAS. The brand makes no PFAS claims and discloses nothing about water-repellent coating treatments. Standard swim-knit fabrics typically require minimal chemical finishing, so risk is lower than hardshell outerwear.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon/polyester blend

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Aerie Pique Full Coverage One Piece is made of, ingredients and materials

Aerie's pique one-piece uses a nylon/polyester blend, a common swimwear base that does not inherently require water-repellent chemical finishes. The pique texture is a woven pattern, not a coating, so it avoids the Teflon-type coating or fluorocarbon treatments that drive PFAS concern in performance swimwear. The blend itself is chemically stable in normal use; the main exposure pathway is dye chemistry during manufacturing and wear, not material degradation.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and dye migration

Nylon and polyester swimwear are typically dyed with reactive or acid dyes; some azo dyes (if used) can leach into sweat or chlorinated water, especially in dark colors. No public testing of this specific product for azo content is on record; risk is category-standard, not elevated for Aerie.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Some swimwear uses formaldehyde-based anti-wrinkle or shrink-control resins during finishing. Aerie does not publish finish specifications; residual formaldehyde off-gassing into sweat during wear is possible but typically low after one wash.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Polyester fiber is often catalyzed with antimony trioxide; this remains in the polymer structure and does not leach in normal wear. Skin contact and sweat do not mobilize it, so exposure risk is negligible for end users.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Nylon and polyester shed small fibers in washing, particularly in early wears. This is environmental, not a direct health hazard to the wearer, but relevant to product lifecycle impact. Rinsing in a mesh bag or washing infrequently reduces fiber loss.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Teflon-type coating or fluorocarbon coatings

Pique construction and the product description indicate no water-repellent finish; Teflon-type coating fume risk at heat is not present. This is a significant advantage over treated performance swimwear.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Aerie (American Eagle's intimates label) does not publicly disclose detailed chemical supplier standards or third-party swimwear certifications like OEKO-TEX or bluesign. The brand has not faced major recalls or chemical controversies tied to swimwear in public records. Their silence on PFAS and chemical transparency is typical for mainstream swimwear makers but below the standard of specialty eco-brands.

How it compares in its category

Standard nylon/polyester one-pieces like this are the baseline of the category; they carry no inherent advantage or disadvantage versus competitors at the same price tier (Old Navy, Target, Lands End). Premium swimwear often adds silicone coatings or fluorocarbon water repellency, which raises PFAS risk; Aerie's basic construction avoids that. Specialty eco-brands (Patagonia, Girlfriend Collective) publish dye and chemical audits, positioning them as lower-chemical alternatives.

If you buy it

Rinse in cool water after each saltwater or chlorine use to remove residual chemicals and reduce dye migration into skin. Wash in cool water with mild detergent; avoid bleach, which can break down nylon fibers over time and may increase leaching of residual dyes. Replace when elasticity fails or seams separate, typically after 50-80 wears of regular use. Store dry away from direct sunlight to slow dye fading and fiber weakening.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Aerie has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Swimwear

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

More swimwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.