PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
LITA Natural Thick Artificial Grass turf Cut to Length Realistic Deluxe 1.5in Pile Height

AstroTurf · Artificial Turf

LITA Natural Thick Artificial Grass turf Cut to Length Realistic Deluxe 1.5in Pile Height

Poor

Wait for manufacturer to disclose coating chemistry; artificial grass commonly uses PFAS repellents.

Verdict: SkipPE synthetic turf itself is stable, but unspecified backing adhesives and PFAS-laden coatings warrant manufacturer transparency before purchase.

LITA's polyethylene turf pile has undisclosed backing and adhesive coatings with no PFAS content information. Synthetic grass backing commonly receives PFAS-based water-resistant and stain-resistant treatments.

The safe swap

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

AstroTurf

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyethylene (PE) synthetic turf pile with unspecified backing/adhesive coatings

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding (PE pile degradation)

Polyethylene turf breaks down under UV, foot traffic, and temperature cycling, releasing microfibers into surrounding soil and air. No quantified shedding rate is published for this product, but PE synthetic turf inherently sheds under normal use.

20/ 100
⛏️

Backing adhesive leachates (unspecified composition)

The backing and adhesive systems are not disclosed. Common urethane-based adhesives can off-gas volatile organics and may contain heavy metals (antimony as a catalyst); rain and heat can mobilize adhesive components into surrounding soil and groundwater over years.

70/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing from backing/adhesive

Newly installed synthetic turf can off-gas odors and low-level VOCs for weeks. The unspecified backing chemistry means potential formaldehyde resins or solvent residues; ventilation and time reduce exposure, but long-term chemical outgassing profile is unknown.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Artificial turf manufacturers routinely apply PFAS-based hydrophobic finishes to improve drainage and durability. AstroTurf's silence on this ingredient, combined with industry prevalence, makes PFAS presence probable but unconfirmed for LITA turf; graded separately above.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or test data on this specific product identify lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals. Realistic-colored turf may use azo dyes or titanium dioxide; AstroTurf has not published pigment or additive safety specs for this line.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

LITA's pile is polyethylene (PE) synthetic fiber, a chemically inert plastic that sheds microplastics under foot traffic and UV breakdown. The critical unknowns are the backing system (typically polypropylene or polyurethane with adhesive) and any topcoat applied for water repellency or durability, which commonly contain PFAS-based chemistry in the artificial turf industry. The 1.5-inch pile height increases surface area for outdoor degradation and potential particulate shedding into soil.

The brand's record and disclosure

AstroTurf has not publicly disclosed coating chemistry, PFAS use, or third-party testing for this product line. The company has not signed pledges to eliminate PFAS from turf products, unlike some competitors. No major recalls or safety violations are documented for this specific SKU, but the silent stance on chemical additives is a transparency red flag in a category where PFAS use is widespread and largely unregulated.

How it compares in its category

Most artificial turf contains PFAS-based water repellents; LITA sits in the middle-market segment where disclosure is weakest. Premium brands like some FieldTurf lines publish chemical inventories; budget alternatives rarely disclose at all. This product lacks both the transparency of high-end options and the price advantage of no-disclosure budget goods, creating unfavorable risk-to-cost positioning.

If you buy it

Maintain it by rinsing with plain water to remove dust and pollen; avoid high-heat pressure washing (above 140F), which can degrade pile and potentially release coatings into runoff. Replace or remove after 8-10 years of heavy foot traffic or sooner if pile matting or visible backing exposure occurs. Pregnant people and young children should minimize extended contact given PFAS exposure pathways through inhalation and soil contact; consider requesting full chemical disclosure from the seller before installation.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
AstroTurf has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Artificial Turf

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

AstroTurf

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

Polypropylene (PP) astroturf

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade45Poor
💨

VOC off-gassing from polyurethane or latex adhesive

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polypropylene UV degradation and microplastic shedding

High concern

20
⚠️

Backing adhesive failure and fiber separation

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Infill contamination (if rubber granules used)

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; polypropylene rarely requires PFAS, but no brand disclosure on treatments.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length

AstroTurf

LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length

Synthetic turf fibers (polyethylene/polypropylene backing)

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade63Good
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from fibers

Moderate concern

45
⛏️

Leaching from backing polymers or adhesives

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Infill contamination (if sand or crumb used)

Limited concern

70

Wait for brand to disclose turf composition; synthetic turf historically may use PFAS.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Multi Sport Turf

Sportmaster

Multi Sport Turf

synthetic turf (polyethylene/polypropylene fibers, infill material unspecified)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade49Poor
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Undisclosed infill composition and leachates

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Fiber degradation and microplastic generation

Limited concern

70
💨

Volatile organic compound off-gassing during installation

Limited concern

70

Insufficient brand disclosure.

Risky category by default

More artificial turf grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.