PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
Bridgestone Golf Glove All Weather GLTS24 Puti 26cm

Bridgestone · Golf Balls & Equipment

Bridgestone Golf Glove All Weather GLTS24 Puti 26cm

Poor

Unknown water-repellent coating; Bridgestone discloses nothing about PFAS.

Verdict · SkipSynthetic leather golf glove with unknown water-repellent chemistry; no major hazards reported, but PFAS coating status unconfirmed and brand transparency lacking.

Bridgestone Golf Glove All Weather has synthetic leather or polyurethane with water-resistant coating. Bridgestone does not disclose PFAS or material transparency.

The better-graded swap

Dunlop Ddh I.c.e. Golf Balls

Dunlop

Dunlop Ddh I.c.e. Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic leather or polyurethane with water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-resistant golf gloves often use fluorinated polymers; Bridgestone discloses nothing. If present, these can migrate with skin moisture and persist in the body, though direct dermal absorption from a glove is lower risk than from textiles in contact with larger body areas.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compounds (VOC) off-gassing from coating and adhesives

New synthetic leather gloves often emit slight chemical odor during first use and storage, indicating residual solvents or unreacted polymer components. This is typically mild and transient but indicates incomplete curing or use of high-volatility solvents.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or test reports found for this model. Synthetic leather manufacturing sometimes involves formaldehyde-releasing resins, but modern polyurethane formulations typically avoid it. Bridgestone's lack of Oeko-Tex certification means this is unverified.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Golf gloves are typically dyed before coating; restricted azo dyes (carcinogenic metabolites) and cadmium/lead pigments are prohibited under REACH in the EU but not all manufacturers test. No specific test data available for this Bridgestone model.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather degradation

Synthetic leather is a microplastic source when it degrades, though gloves shed minimally during normal use. Laundering accelerates shedding; replacement timing matters more than initial composition for this hazard.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This glove uses synthetic leather (likely polyurethane or PU-based material) rather than genuine leather, paired with a water-resistant topcoat. Synthetic leather avoids some tanning chemical risks but introduces polymer-based chemistry that depends entirely on the coating formulation. The water-repellent finish is the critical unknown, while not inherently hazardous, water-repellent treatments on textiles commonly rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS family) or other durable polymers. Bridgestone's silence on this coating chemistry makes the actual risk profile unclear.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bridgestone (tire and sporting goods manufacturer) has not published PFAS policies or material transparency statements specific to apparel or golf accessories. The company does not appear to be a signatory of the ZDHC Gateway or similar textile chemical disclosure frameworks. For this specific glove model (GLTS24 Puti 26cm), no third-party testing, certifications (Oeko-Tex, REACH compliance statements), or recall history is publicly available. This absence of disclosure is itself a signal that water-repellent coating composition has not been externally validated.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves are a niche apparel item with minimal regulatory oversight compared to children's clothing or intimate wear. Most competitors in the all-weather glove market use similar synthetic leather plus water-repellent coatings, so the hazard profile is broadly typical. However, premium golf glove brands (e.g., Titleist, FootJoy) more frequently disclose use of PFOA-free or fluorine-free water repellents, whereas Bridgestone does not. This makes direct chemical comparison difficult but suggests competitors are at least making the choice transparent.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water with mild soap and air dry; avoid hot water or machine drying, which can degrade synthetic leather and release volatile compounds from coatings. Do not expose to direct heat sources or prolonged sunlight, as UV and temperature cycling will accelerate coating wear and potential microcracking. Replace glove if visible coating flaking, water resistance loss, or strong chemical odors appear. Store in a dry, ventilated space to prevent mold and off-gassing of residual solvents from manufacturing.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bridgestone has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.