PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall28/ 100Poor
Bridgestone Tour Premium Golf Glove

Bridgestone · Golf Balls & Equipment

Bridgestone Tour Premium Golf Glove

Poor

Leather base sound but water-repellent coating finish PFAS status remains unclear.

Verdict · SkipLeather palm golf glove with minimal established hazards; moisture-wicking treatment and synthetic back warrant routine care but no major red flags on record.

Leather palm with synthetic back and moisture-wicking treatment. Bridgestone hasn't disclosed PFAS or water-repellent coating chemistry.

The better-graded swap

PGA Tour Tee-Up Sticky Golf Balls

PGA Tour

PGA Tour Tee-Up Sticky Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather palm with synthetic back; moisture-wicking treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Leather tanning can involve chromium (chrome tanning, most common) or vegetable tannins. Chromium levels in finished leather are generally low after processing, but residual metal salts may persist. Direct prolonged skin contact with untreated or poorly finished leather could theoretically present minor exposure, though golf glove use is brief and intermittent.

Source, FDA
70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester or nylon components may be treated with formaldehyde-based resins for water repellency or shape retention. No specific test data for this model is available, but such treatments are common in sportswear. Exposure during wear is minimal; off-gassing is most relevant during storage or in warm conditions.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Degradation and microfiber shedding from synthetic back

Polyester or nylon backing degrades with repeated flexing, washing, and sweat exposure over months of use. This can shed microfibers into the environment and potentially be inhaled during wear. The degree of shedding depends on weave density and coating durability; no manufacturer data quantifies this for this model.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Moisture-wicking finish chemical composition

Bridgestone does not disclose the chemistry of the moisture-wicking treatment applied to the synthetic back. It may be a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating, silicone-based finish, or other polymer; without transparency, specific hazard assessment is not possible. Performance data suggests the treatment remains stable during normal use and washing.

95/ 100

Azo dyes or other colorant toxicity

Golf gloves are typically dyed during leather or synthetic preparation. No recalls or safety alerts specific to Bridgestone Tour Premium colorants are on record. Azo dyes are regulated in the EU and increasingly restricted, but testing specificity for this glove is not publicly available.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Bridgestone Tour Premium pairs a leather palm (typically cowhide or sheepskin) with a synthetic polyester or nylon back, a standard construction for golf gloves. The moisture-wicking treatment is likely a water-repellent finish applied to the synthetic component to manage sweat during play. Leather itself is relatively inert when tanned properly, but the synthetic back and any applied coatings (including water-repellent finishes) are the main exposure points during handling and wear.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bridgestone, a major Japanese tire and sporting goods manufacturer, does not publicly disclose detailed chemical inventories or certifications for golf gloves specifically. The brand has faced scrutiny over PFAS use in tire manufacturing but has not transparently addressed it in apparel or small goods. No recalls or chemical controversies specific to this glove model are on public record, though the parent company's broader silence on PFAS "forever chemicals" is notable.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves occupy a niche market with minimal regulatory oversight or third-party testing. Most competitors (Titleist, Callaway, FootJoy) use similar leather-synthetic blends with moisture treatments and do not publicly disclose hazard data. The Bridgestone Tour Premium sits in the mid-premium price tier and is comparable in construction to widely sold alternatives; no independent data suggests it presents different PFAS concerns than mainstream rivals.

If you buy it

Wash the glove in cool water with mild soap after heavy use to remove sweat salts and microbes that can degrade materials. Dry flat away from direct heat or sunlight, which can crack or shrink leather. Replace when the palm shows visible wear, texture loss, or reduced grip; this typically occurs after 12-24 months of regular play. Store in a dry, cool place; moisture and heat accelerate degradation of both leather and synthetic components.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 55% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bridgestone has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.