PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
Callaway Chrome Soft Triple Track Personalized Golf Balls

Callaway · Golf Balls & Equipment

Callaway Chrome Soft Triple Track Personalized Golf Balls

Poor

Skip until Callaway discloses coating formula or confirms PFAS-free.

Verdict · SkipGolf balls pose minimal acute hazard; PFAS coating chemistry undisclosed. Lower concern with standard handling; avoid prolonged skin contact and water contamination risk.

Proprietary cover coating enables water resistance and durability, but Callaway provides no public PFAS disclosure. Polymer coatings often contain fluorochemicals.

The better-graded swap

Volvik Marvel Gift Set 2.0 Distance Golf Balls Captain America

Volvik

Volvik Marvel Gift Set 2.0 Distance Golf Balls Captain America

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic polymer core with proprietary cover coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Callaway does not disclose whether the proprietary cover coating contains PFAS compounds. Water and abrasion-resistant coatings on golf balls commonly use fluorochemicals; coating contact with skin and water bodies poses potential exposure routes if PFAS are present.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from cover degradation

Synthetic polymer cover will fragment over time and with use, releasing microparticles into water and soil. Cumulative exposure across millions of golf balls globally contributes to microplastic pollution in aquatic systems; individual user risk during handling is low.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No testing or recalls document toxic metal contamination in Callaway ball pigments or graphics. Standard ink formulations for sports equipment do not routinely trigger heavy metal concerns, but proprietary inks are not independently verified.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from coating off-gassing

Golf balls stored in bags or lockers may off-gas solvent residues from manufacturing; no complaints or documented respiratory effects from this product are on record. Ventilation during storage and transport mitigates any minimal risk.

95/ 100

Skin irritation from coating residue or dyes

Chrome Soft balls carry standard color and markings; allergic or irritant contact dermatitis is not reported for this model. Risk is confined to individuals with documented sensitivities to synthetic polymers or dyes.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Callaway Chrome Soft Triple Track balls use a synthetic polymer core (likely ionomer or urethane blend) wrapped in a proprietary cover coating designed for durability and spin control. The cover coating is the material of concern, Callaway does not publicly disclose whether it contains PFAS (PFAS "forever chemicals"), which are common in golf ball surface treatments for water and abrasion resistance. The core itself is stable under normal use conditions and does not leach into skin or water during typical play.

The brand's record and disclosure

Callaway has not issued public statements regarding PFAS content in its golf balls or coating chemistry transparency. The company holds no known third-party certifications (such as GOTS or bluesign) specific to chemical disclosure in sports equipment. No product recalls or established contamination incidents are documented for this model. The silence on fluorochemical use is consistent with the golf ball industry standard of non-disclosure.

How it compares in its category

Golf balls are not subject to FDA or CPG food-contact regulations, so coating chemistry is largely unregulated in the US market. Most premium golf ball brands (Titleist, TaylorMade, Bridgestone) similarly do not disclose PFAS status on consumer-facing materials. Low-end or biodegradable alternatives exist but offer reduced performance. This product sits in the mainstream premium tier with typical chemical transparency gaps for the category.

If you buy it

Wash hands after extended handling sessions, particularly before eating or touching eyes, to avoid ingestion of coating particles or residues. Avoid storing balls in direct sunlight or extreme heat, which may accelerate cover degradation and particle shedding. Do not submerge or store in water for prolonged periods; retrieve balls promptly from water hazards to limit potential coating leaching into aquatic environments. Replace balls visibly scuffed or peeling to reduce microparticle generation during play.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Callaway has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.