PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall14/ 100Bad
Callaway Chrome Tour Triple Track Golf Balls

Callaway · Golf Balls & Equipment

Callaway Chrome Tour Triple Track Golf Balls

Poor

Golf ball durability coatings often contain PFAS. Brand does not disclose.

Verdict · SkipGolf balls pose minimal ingestion/skin contact risk; PFAS in durability coating is industry-standard and unavoidable; no documented acute hazards specific to Callaway balls.

Synthetic cover and urethane waterproof coating are typical for modern golf balls, which frequently contain PFAS for water and wear resistance. Callaway hasn't disclosed PFAS.

The better-graded swap

Top-Flite 2023 Gamer Golf Glo-Regular-Left Hand-X Large

Top Flite

Top-Flite 2023 Gamer Golf Glo-Regular-Left Hand-X Large

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic cover (likely Surlyn or ionomer), urethane waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Golf ball manufacturers typically use fluorinated polymers or PFAS-containing formulations in topcoats to achieve water repellency and durability. Callaway does not disclose whether Chrome Tour Triple Track balls contain PFAS; industry practice suggests they likely do. This is a known environmental and bioaccumulation concern, not an acute product safety hazard for players.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100

Synthetic cover degradation over time

Ionomer and Surlyn covers can crack, peel, or delaminate with extended play, especially in cold or UV-heavy conditions. This compromises water resistance and may expose sublayers, but poses no direct toxicity risk during normal recreational use.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from worn covers

As synthetic covers degrade on course or during storage, small polymer fragments may shed. Ingestion risk is minimal for players; environmental impact is relevant if balls accumulate in water hazards or rough terrain.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

Callaway balls include printed alignment markings and logos; no data suggests use of cadmium, lead, or other heavy metals in inks or pigments. Standard golf ball printing uses approved colorants, and skin contact during play is brief and non-abrasive.

Source, FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Golf balls stored in bags or boxes may emit minimal VOCs during manufacturing off-gassing, but this is negligible compared to interior textiles or furniture. Exposure is not cumulative during typical storage or play.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Callaway Chrome Tour Triple Track balls use a synthetic ionomer or Surlyn cover (standard for performance golf balls) with a urethane-based waterproof topcoat. The cover provides durability and water resistance during play. Golf balls are not ingested, absorbed through skin, or heated in normal use, which eliminates many hazard routes for typical materials. The coating system is not in contact with food or beverages.

The brand's record and disclosure

Callaway does not publicly disclose material composition, coating chemistry, or PFAS content for this product. The brand has not published sustainability certifications, third-party safety testing, or transparency reports on ball manufacturing. No product recalls or safety incidents specific to this model are on record. Callaway's silence on PFAS is consistent with the broader golf ball industry, where durability coatings are proprietary.

How it compares in its category

Golf balls are a niche product with minimal regulatory oversight and few competing brands publishing safety data. Callaway is one of the largest manufacturers; comparable brands (Titleist, TaylorMade, Bridgestone) similarly do not disclose coating chemistry. Unlike food contact plastics or cosmetics, golf balls have no FDA or EU safety standards. Consumer exposure is limited to handling during play and storage.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry location away from direct sunlight to slow cover degradation. Inspect balls for cracks or peeling before play; replace if the cover is visibly damaged to maintain water resistance and performance. Wash hands after handling if you have skin sensitivities, though direct chemical exposure during normal use is minimal. Do not heat, microwave, or allow prolonged contact with solvents.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Callaway has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.