PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall36/ 100Poor
Callaway Golf Opticolor Glove

Callaway · Golf Balls & Equipment

Callaway Golf Opticolor Glove

Poor

Water-resistant glove; PFAS status unknown from brand.

Verdict · SkipLeather-synthetic hybrid golf glove with unclear water-resistant chemistry; PFAS status undisclosed by Callaway; typical use profile (hand contact, outdoor exposure) presents low acute risk if maintained properly.

Leather palm with synthetic back and water-resistant finish. Callaway provides no PFAS information about their coating.

The better-graded swap

Wilson Ultra Distance Golf Balls

Wilson

Wilson Ultra Distance Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather palm, synthetic back with water-resistant finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-resistant finish composition is undisclosed by Callaway. If water-repellent coating uses legacy PFAS (PFOS, PFOA) or other fluorinated compounds, hand contact during wear and laundry release could introduce low-level exposure, though golf glove use duration is typically brief per session. Fluorine-free water-repellent coating alternatives exist but are not confirmed for this product.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Synthetic back degradation and microfiber release

Polyester or nylon backs can shed microfibers under mechanical stress (washing, repeated flexing) or UV exposure. No specific reports for Callaway Opticolor, but typical for synthetic-backed apparel. Risk is minimal during normal hand wear but increases with improper laundering.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic back may be treated with formaldehyde-based resins for shape retention or wrinkle resistance. Golf gloves are not subject to mandatory formaldehyde limits in most markets. No reports specific to this product, and hand contact exposure would be low compared to apparel worn against skin.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes in colorants

The 'Opticolor' name suggests deliberate color treatment. Certain azo dyes can release carcinogenic amines under acidic or reductive conditions. No specific violations reported for Callaway products, and golf gloves are not typically subject to strict dye regulations if not intended for children.

95/ 100

Leather tanning residues and chromium

Leather palms may contain chromium from chrome tanning (standard in the industry). Hand contact exposure is generally low and not documented as a hazard for glove wearers, but individuals with contact dermatitis or chromium sensitivity should be cautious.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Opticolor glove pairs a leather palm (typically cow or synthetic leather) with a synthetic polyester or nylon back treated with a water-resistant finish. The water-resistant coating is the main chemical variable here; Callaway does not disclose whether this uses PFAS-based durable water repellents (water-repellent coating) or fluorine-free alternatives, which is a material gap. Leather itself poses minimal hazard under normal hand-contact conditions, but the synthetic back and finish warrant attention if the glove is heated or washed in ways that could degrade the coating.

The brand's record and disclosure

Callaway (owned by Topgolf Callaway Brands) has not published specific material disclosures or PFAS statements for apparel or golf equipment lines. The company does not appear on public lists of brands with formal PFAS phase-out commitments. No major recalls or contamination incidents are on record for Callaway golf gloves, but the absence of transparency on water-repellent coating chemistry means end-users cannot verify whether PFAS was used in the water-resistant treatment.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves are a niche product; most competitors (Titleist, FootJoy, Mizuno) also use leather palms and synthetic backs with water-resistant finishes and similarly do not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. The Opticolor line is mainstream mid-market; specialty gloves marketed as PFAS-free or using fluorine-free water-repellent coating are uncommon and rarely labeled at retail. In terms of wear and durability, the Opticolor is typical for the category and does not stand out as higher or lower risk than peers.

If you buy it

Hand-wash only; avoid machine washing or high heat, which can degrade the water-resistant coating and potentially mobilize unreacted chemicals or microplastics from the synthetic back. Replace when the palm leather shows significant wear or the water-resistant finish stops beading water (typically 1-2 seasons of regular play). Store in a cool, dry place and allow it to air dry after use. Do not expose to chlorine or harsh solvents, which can compromise both leather and synthetic components.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Callaway has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.