PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
Callaway Golf Weather Spann Glove

Callaway · Golf Balls & Equipment

Callaway Golf Weather Spann Glove

Poor

Golf glove with water-repellent coating; Callaway discloses no PFAS details.

Verdict · SkipSynthetic golf glove with water-resistant coating; no disclosed PFAS or chemical hazards on record, but water-repellent coating finish opacity and brand silence warrant cautious use.

Callaway Weather Spann Glove uses synthetic leather or microfiber with water-resistant coating typical of golf gear. Callaway provides no public disclosure of PFAS status.

The better-graded swap

Maxfli StraightFli Graffiti Golf Balls

Maxfli

Maxfli StraightFli Graffiti Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

synthetic leather or microfiber with water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🍳

water-repellent coating composition (fluorinated or fluorine-free unknown)

The glove's water-resistant finish almost certainly contains some fluorinated compound, but Callaway does not disclose whether it is PFAS-based or a newer fluorine-free alternative. Skin contact with intact coatings poses minimal acute risk, but coating degradation over time could theoretically release particles.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and product lifespan

The water-repellent coating will gradually degrade with use and laundering, potentially releasing coating particles or trapped contaminants. This is a normal wear pattern, not a defect, but signals when replacement is due.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Synthetic microfiber durability and shedding

Microfiber materials can shed microfibers with wear and washing, but golf gloves are used in outdoor, low-friction contact (not aggressive laundering) and pose negligible microfiber release risk compared to apparel washed frequently.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde release has been reported for Callaway golf gloves or similar synthetic microfiber gloves in this category. Formaldehyde-based finishing resins are less common in performance synthetic apparel than in cotton.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes in synthetic leather coloring

Synthetic leather used in golf gloves is not known to use restricted azo dyes. No safety issues have been reported for the Spann or comparable Callaway gloves.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Callaway Weather Spann Glove uses synthetic microfiber or synthetic leather with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating to shed moisture and maintain grip in wet conditions. water-repellent coating finishes traditionally relied on PFAS chemistry, though modern formulations sometimes use fluorine-free alternatives; Callaway has not publicly stated which type is used here. Synthetic microfiber itself carries minimal chemical hazard compared to natural leather or cotton, but the coating's composition remains opaque to consumers.

The brand's record and disclosure

Callaway does not publish chemical ingredient lists or environmental disclosures for apparel products, and has not issued public statements on PFAS use in their golf gloves or other gear. The brand has no known certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or bluesign) that would verify absence of restricted chemicals. This silence is typical across golf equipment makers but limits independent verification of coating safety.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves are not subject to the same regulatory scrutiny as apparel for general wear, so chemical standards are weaker. Most competitors (Titleist, FootJoy, Ping) likewise do not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. Gloves made from uncoated leather or cotton alternatives avoid water-repellent coating risks entirely but sacrifice weather performance. The Spann sits in the mainstream market segment with no advantage or disadvantage in transparency versus peers.

If you buy it

Wash the glove in cool water after use to remove salt, sweat, and debris that can degrade the coating over time. Avoid hot water or machine drying, which may compromise the water-resistant finish and any embedded chemicals. Replace the glove when the synthetic material shows cracking, peeling, or loss of grip (typically 1-2 seasons of regular use). Store in a dry environment to prevent mold growth, which is more common in moisture-trapping synthetics than leather.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Callaway has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.