PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
Callaway Men's Opti Color Golf Gloves

Callaway · Golf Balls & Equipment

Callaway Men's Opti Color Golf Gloves

Poor

Water-treated glove; brand silent on PFAS composition.

Verdict · SkipLeather-synthetic hybrid with undisclosed water treatment poses moderate PFAS risk; no other major hazards documented. Brand silence on chemistry warrants cautious use.

Leather palm with synthetic back and water-resistant treatment. Callaway doesn't specify their coating chemistry publicly.

The better-graded swap

Nike Golf Ball

Nike Golf

Nike Golf Ball

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather palm with synthetic back, water-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-resistant finish chemistry is undisclosed; golf glove repellency typically requires fluorochemicals, but brand confirms nothing. Skin contact during use is intermittent and brief, reducing acute exposure risk, but degraded coating over time may shed particles.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic back

Synthetic fabrics shed microfibers with wear and washing, particularly if the material degrades. Washing golf gloves by hand in cool water minimizes shedding; tumble drying or abrasive cleaning accelerates fiber loss.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in synthetic back fabric

No recalls or reports of hazardous dyes in Callaway gloves. Synthetic polyester/nylon backs in apparel-grade textiles are generally produced to EU REACH standards in major factories, but brand does not certify supplier compliance.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Leather tanning and synthetic fabric finishing can use formaldehyde-based resins, but off-gassing from gloves is minimal due to small surface area and intermittent contact. No complaints on record for this product.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Leather tanning historically used chromium, but modern tanneries in major suppliers (where Callaway likely sources) use controlled processes. No cadmium or lead contamination reported for this product category or brand.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Callaway Opti Color gloves combine genuine leather palms (for grip and durability) with synthetic fabric backs (typically polyester or nylon) and a water-resistant finish. The water-resistant treatment is the primary concern, most golf glove water repellents rely on fluorochemical coatings (PFAS-based) to prevent rain from soaking into the palm and degrading grip. Callaway does not publicly specify whether this glove uses PFAS, fluorine-free hydrophobic treatments, or wax-based repellency. Leather itself has no hazard of this kind on record, but the finish chemistry remains opaque.

The brand's record and disclosure

Callaway (owned by Topgolf Callaway Brands) has not published a PFAS policy or environmental chemistry disclosure for apparel or gloves as of available public records. The brand does not appear on lists of companies with formal commitments to PFAS elimination (e.g., ZDHC Gateway certifications for footwear/textile suppliers). No recalls or safety alerts have been issued for Callaway golf gloves related to chemical hazards. This silence is typical for the golf equipment industry, which lags other apparel sectors in transparency.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves universally require water-resistant treatment; Callaway's hybrid leather-synthetic design is standard. Most competitors (Titleist, FootJoy, TaylorMade) similarly decline to disclose water-treatment chemistry. Premium alternatives (e.g., uncoated cabretta leather gloves) sacrifice water resistance but eliminate chemical-treatment risk. Budget synthetic gloves avoid leather but often have heavier fluorochemical coatings. Callaway Opti Color occupies the mid-market sweet spot for performance but offers no chemical transparency advantage.

If you buy it

Wash hands thoroughly after wearing to minimize skin contact with any treatment residue. Avoid prolonged direct contact with the inside palm surface, especially if skin is broken or irritated. Replace when the water-repellent finish visibly degrades (beading stops) rather than attempting to re-treat it yourself with unknown chemicals. Store in a dry place away from heat sources; leather and synthetic blends are not heat-sensitive at normal room temperatures but can absorb odors and degrade faster in damp conditions.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Callaway has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.