PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall28/ 100Poor
Callaway Men's X-Tech Golf Glove

Callaway · Golf Balls & Equipment

Callaway Men's X-Tech Golf Glove

Poor

Water-resistant glove likely using water-repellent coating; PFAS risk unconfirmed.

Verdict · SkipSynthetic golf glove with unconfirmed PFAS in water-resistant treatment; no known safety recalls, but moisture-wicking coatings warrant watchful use and proper laundering.

X-Tech features synthetic leather, microfiber, and moisture-wicking with water resistance. Callaway doesn't disclose water-repellent coating composition or PFAS.

The better-graded swap

Pinnacle Golf Balls Mint Quality 50 Pack

Pinnacle

Pinnacle Golf Balls Mint Quality 50 Pack

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic leather, microfiber, moisture-wicking fabric with water-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Callaway does not disclose whether the water-resistant treatment uses perfluorinated compounds (PFOA/PFOS class) or PFAS alternatives. Skin contact over prolonged use may result in trace absorption, though risk is low for a sports glove versus food packaging or fabric worn directly against skin for hours daily.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

Coating degradation under heat or sweat

Repeated washing, sweat exposure, and UV during outdoor play may cause the water-resistant coating to break down, potentially releasing coating fragments or changing the product's safety profile over time. This is accelerated wear, not acute toxicity, but signals eventual replacement need.

70/ 100
⚠️

Allergic contact dermatitis from finish or dyes

Sensitive skin may react to uncertified dyes, adhesives, or finish chemicals in the microfiber or synthetic leather. No published sensitizer testing specific to this glove; risk is individual and low to moderate compared to dyed textiles worn against large skin areas.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Synthetic leather binder chemicals and plasticizers

Polyurethane or PVC synthetic leather can release trace phthalates or other plasticizers during manufacturing and early use. No specific recalls or complaints are documented for this product; risk is typical for synthetic athletic gloves.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Microfiber backing and color treatments may use formaldehyde-releasing resins as crosslinkers. No OEKO-TEX or similar certification available for this product, so direct verification is not possible; standard practice in budget-to-mid athletic apparel.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Callaway X-Tech uses synthetic leather (likely polyurethane or PVC) bonded to microfiber backing with a water-resistant topcoat treatment. Synthetic leather avoids heavy-metal tanning chemicals found in chromium-tanned leather but relies on chemical binders and coatings for durability and water resistance. The moisture-wicking fabric layer typically uses polyester or nylon with finish treatments applied to repel sweat and rain; these finishes often include fluorinated compounds (PFAS class) or silicone-based alternatives, though Callaway's exact chemistry is not publicly disclosed.

The brand's record and disclosure

Callaway does not publicly disclose material safety certifications, PFAS presence, or formaldehyde/dye testing for apparel products on their website or product labels. No major safety recalls for this glove model are on record with CPSC. The brand has not adopted transparent chemical disclosure standards like Bluesign or OEKO-TEX certification common in premium activewear, suggesting either no third-party testing or no commitment to public reporting.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves in this price tier typically use synthetic leather with water-resistant coatings; Callaway's construction is standard for the market. Premium alternatives (e.g.Footjoy, TaylorMade rarely disclose PFAS or other finish chemistry either, making this product neither exceptionally risky nor distinctly different from competitors regarding disclosed PFAS information. The X-Tech line is positioned as mid-to-premium with emphasis on moisture management, which usually means aggressive chemical treatments but no published hazard data.

If you buy it

Wash the glove in cool water with mild detergent after heavy use or at season end; avoid chlorine bleach and high heat dryers, which can degrade synthetic leather and release coating residues. Do not treat the glove with additional waterproofing sprays unless they explicitly state no PFAS in the formulation. Store in a cool, dry place; replace when the synthetic leather shows cracking, peeling, or loss of grip, typically after 1-2 seasons of regular play. If skin irritation develops, discontinue use and rinse the glove thoroughly.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Callaway has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.