PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall16/ 100Bad
Carhartt Men's Storm Defender Shoreline Jacket

Carhartt · Rain Jackets

Carhartt Men's Storm Defender Shoreline Jacket

Bad

Popular outdoor brand does not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry; PFAS risk unconfirmed.

Verdict: SkipPolyester jacket with undisclosed water-repellent coating poses unconfirmed PFAS risk; no other established hazards for this material class reported. Suitable if PFAS concern is acceptable to user.

Carhartt's Storm Defender uses water-repellent coating but does not specify chemical composition or PFAS status. No third-party verification available for this model.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester with water-repellent coating water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition

Carhartt does not disclose whether the Storm Defender water-repellent coating uses PFAS-based fluorocarbon chemistry or alternative formulations. Risk of PFAS exposure from the coating is unconfirmed but plausible given industry norms; graded separately at 20/100.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Polyester fiber degradation and microfiber shedding

No documented hazard or contamination specific to Carhartt polyester jackets. Microfiber shedding occurs with any polyester garment during washing but poses no direct health risk to the wearer; environmental impact remains under study.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public record of formaldehyde-based finishing agents in Carhartt outerwear. Polyester typically does not require formaldehyde resins for wrinkle or shrink resistance as cotton does, making this hazard class unlikely but unconfirmed by brand testing data.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or reports of azo dye or heavy metal contamination in Carhartt polyester jackets. Brand does not publish dyeing process transparency, but black or dark colorways used in workwear are routinely tested by retailers for compliance with textile safety standards.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

No evidence that this jacket has been treated with flame retardant additives. Polyester is inherently less flammable than cellulose fibers, and workwear-grade polyester typically does not require additional flame retardant coatings unless marketed for fire-protective use.

Source: EPA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Storm Defender Shoreline is primarily polyester with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer shell. Polyester itself is a stable synthetic polymer with no known leaching hazards under normal wear. The water-repellent coating is the critical unknown: Carhartt does not publicly specify whether this uses PFAS-based chemistry (such as fluorocarbon compounds) or newer PFAS-free alternatives. water-repellent coating durability and water shedding performance often correlate with fluorinated compounds, though non-fluorinated options exist.

The brand's record and disclosure

Carhartt has not published transparency reports on water-repellent coating chemistry or committed to PFAS phase-out timelines as of available public records. The brand does not appear on lists of retailers with formal PFAS disclosure policies or third-party certifications (such as Bluesign or GOTS). This silence is typical of many workwear manufacturers but represents a gap in consumer information. No recalls or regulatory actions specific to Carhartt outerwear coatings are documented in public databases.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream outdoor and workwear jackets at this price point use either PFAS-based water-repellent coating or untested proprietary formulations; transparent water-repellent coating disclosure remains uncommon in the category. Brands like Patagonia and some technical manufacturers have begun phasing to PFAS-free alternatives, but Carhartt's approach is unremarkable and not notably better or worse than market average. The polyester base is standard and poses no greater risk than competitor jackets in terms of base material hazards.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and avoid excessive machine drying, as high heat can degrade both polyester and water-repellent coating coatings over time. Do not iron at high temperatures. The water-repellent coating will degrade gradually with washing and weather exposure (typically 50-100 wash cycles); re-treatment with commercial water-repellent coating sprays may prolong water shedding, though the chemistry of aftermarket products varies. If water-repellent coating begins flaking or peeling, discontinue use of that garment.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Carhartt has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.