PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall8/ 100Bad
Columbia Men's Glennaker Lake Rain Jacket

Columbia · Rain Jackets

Columbia Men's Glennaker Lake Rain Jacket

Bad

Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry makes this a moderate risk.

Verdict: SkipTypical rain jacket with undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry and moderate PFAS risk. Safe with proper care; verify no PFC water repellent if PFAS-sensitive.

This nylon rain jacket has a standard water-repellent treatment, but Columbia keeps its water-repellent coating chemistry private and doesn't confirm PFAS avoidance. Without transparency or testing, conventional fluorocarbon-based water-repellent coating is possible.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Nylon rain jackets typically use water-repellent coating treatments; Columbia has not disclosed whether this jacket contains PFAS-based or fluorine-free chemistry. Skin contact and air inhalation during wear pose low-level exposure risk if PFAS is present, particularly when wet or when water-repellent coating degrades.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100

Coating degradation and chemical volatilization

water-repellent coating coatings degrade over time and with washing. If PFAS-based water-repellent coating is used, degradation may increase exposure as chemicals migrate into sweat or degrade into other compounds during normal wear, especially in warm conditions.

70/ 100
💨

Polyurethane lining off-gassing

If the jacket includes a polyurethane or polyester lining (common in rain jackets), volatile organic compounds (VOCs) may off-gas, especially in warm or humid conditions. This typically diminishes within the first few wears after purchase.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon textiles can contain formaldehyde-releasing resins from dye processes. No specific recalls or reports exist for the Glennaker Lake, but this is a baseline risk in synthetic apparel. Washing before wear reduces residual formaldehyde exposure.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes in colored textile portions

Dark-colored nylon jackets may use azo dyes, which can release aromatic amines under stress or perspiration. No specific issues are documented for Columbia's Glennaker Lake, but this is a general concern for synthetic outdoor apparel.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Glennaker Lake uses nylon fabric with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to the exterior. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on PFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS) to repel water, though some manufacturers have transitioned to fluorine-free alternatives. Columbia has not publicly disclosed whether this jacket uses legacy PFAS-based water-repellent coating or a newer chemistry, which is the primary chemical concern for this product.

The brand's record and disclosure

Columbia Sportswear has not made a formal public commitment to eliminating PFAS from its product line, nor does it routinely disclose water-repellent coating chemistry on product labels or websites. The company is silent on this issue compared to competitors like Patagonia and Arc'teryx, which have announced transitions to PFAS-free water repellents. This absence of transparency makes it difficult for consumers to assess PFAS exposure from Columbia rain gear.

How it compares in its category

Nylon rain jackets with water-repellent coating coatings are standard across the outdoor apparel industry, and most remain PFAS-dependent or unverified. Columbia's Glennaker Lake is priced in the mainstream range ($100, 150) and offers typical durability for this price tier. Brands like REI Co-op, Patagonia, and Fjallraven offer comparable jackets with either disclosed PFAS-free water-repellent coating or transparent material sourcing, giving consumers more information for informed choice.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and avoid high-heat drying, as excessive heat can degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially volatilize any residual chemical treatments. Inspect seams and coating annually; reapply water-repellent coating every 1-2 years if water no longer beads on the surface (use a fluorine-free water-repellent coating product if PFAS is a concern). Store dry and away from direct sunlight to prevent coating breakdown. If water-repellent coating chemistry matters to you, contact Columbia directly to confirm whether this model uses PFAS-based or PFAS-free treatments.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Columbia has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.