PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall14/ 100Bad
TaylorMade Golf Rain Control Gloves

TaylorMade · Golf Balls & Equipment

TaylorMade Golf Rain Control Gloves

Poor

Golf rain glove water-repellent coating chemicals not disclosed.

Verdict · SkipWater-repellent coating likely contains undisclosed PFAS; no other major hazards reported for this material class, but brand transparency is weak.

Rain gloves typically require water-repellent finishes often based on PFAS, with no transparency from TaylorMade about composition.

The better-graded swap

Bridgestone Fit Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Bridgestone Fit Golf Glove

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic leather or polyurethane with water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Rain-control gloves almost universally use water-repellent coating finishes; conventional water-repellent coating formulations contain PFAS. TaylorMade has not disclosed its water-repellent coating chemistry, leaving PFAS presence unconfirmed but probable for this water-resistant product category.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather degradation

Polyurethane synthetic leather degrades over time with use and washing, potentially releasing microplastic particles. This is a general concern for synthetic leather gloves after extended wear, though not specific to TaylorMade or this model.

70/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and reapplication chemicals

As the water-repellent coating wears, users may apply aftermarket water-repellent sprays (often PFAS-based) to restore function. The glove itself does not pose a known risk from reapplication, but the practice may introduce additional PFAS exposure.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or reports of formaldehyde residues in TaylorMade gloves. Modern polyurethane athletic gloves rarely retain free formaldehyde, though older leather finishes sometimes did; no public evidence of this issue with this brand.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No documented cases of lead or cadmium contamination in TaylorMade golf gloves. Synthetic leather dyes in athletic apparel are generally regulated for heavy metals in major markets, but brand-specific testing data is not public.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

TaylorMade Rain Control Gloves are synthetic leather (likely polyurethane or PU) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment applied to the surface. The water-repellent coating is the functional layer that repels rain, but water-repellent coating finishes on textiles and leather goods have historically relied on PFAS-based chemicals (perfluorocarbons) to achieve water resistance. Polyurethane itself is stable under normal use; the concern centers on what chemical additives were used in the water-repellent treatment and whether they leach or off-gas during handling or storage.

The brand's record and disclosure

TaylorMade (owned by Callaway Golf) does not publicly disclose the specific water-repellent coating chemistry or PFAS status of its golf gloves. No PFAS-free certification or transparent supplier standards have been published for this product line. The brand has not issued statements ruling out PFAS in rain-control apparel, placing it in the silent category typical of legacy golf equipment makers. Independent testing or third-party certifications (OEKO-TEX, Cradle to Cradle) are not listed for these gloves.

How it compares in its category

Rain gloves occupy a niche where water-repellency is the primary selling point, making water-repellent coating treatment essential and often unavoidable. Most conventional golf gloves use PFAS-based water-repellent coating; brands offering PFAS-free or certified alternatives (e.g., via fluorocarbon-free or wax-based coatings) remain rare in golf apparel and typically cost more. Without disclosure, TaylorMade's gloves sit in the middle of an opaque market; they are neither flagged for problematic practices nor verified as lower concern than peers.

If you buy it

Wear gloves on your hand during use, away from the mouth or face. Store in a cool, dry place away from heat sources; do not machine wash or tumble dry, as heat can degrade the coating. Wash by hand in cool water with mild soap only. Replace gloves every 12-18 months or when the grip or water-repellency visibly deteriorates; worn-out gloves shed microfibers and lose their protective function. If you have concerns about PFAS exposure, contact the brand directly to request water-repellent coating composition data.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
TaylorMade has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.