PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
Cobra Men's Pur Tech Golf Glove

Cobra · Golf Balls & Equipment

Cobra Men's Pur Tech Golf Glove

Poor

Golf glove with water-repellent coating treatment; Cobra does not disclose PFAS status.

Verdict · SkipLeather-synthetic blend golf glove with undisclosed water-repellent coating treatment poses moderate PFAS uncertainty; no major hazards documented for this material class, but brand transparency is weak.

Golf glove combining leather palm with synthetic backing, likely featuring water-repellent coating typical of performance gear. Cobra provides no PFAS disclosure.

The better-graded swap

Bridgestone Limited Edition Tour B RX Leaderboard Golf Balls

Bridgestone

Bridgestone Limited Edition Tour B RX Leaderboard Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather palm with synthetic backing, likely water-repellent coating-treated

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Cobra does not disclose water-repellent coating formulation. Fluorochemical water repellents (C6 or legacy C8 PFAS) are still common in performance apparel. Skin contact during wear and hand-washing may constitute minor exposure, though gloves do not cover large body surface area.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Synthetic fiber degradation and microfiber shedding

Frequent hand motion and friction during golf use may accelerate wear of synthetic backing fibers, releasing microfiber particles. This is cosmetic and hygiene concern rather than acute toxicity, but cumulative exposure is not well-studied.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or alerts on record for Cobra golf gloves. Formaldehyde use in polyester/nylon blends is regulated under Oeko-Tex and EU standards; risk is low if the glove carries basic certifications, which Cobra does not publicly advertise.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dye allergens

Leather and synthetic textiles can be dyed with azo compounds, some of which are sensitizers. No specific incidents reported for Cobra gloves. Sweat on the palm may increase dye migration slightly, but exposure is localized to hands.

95/ 100

Leather tanning residues

Leather palm may contain chromium or other tanning agents, but exposure is minimal during normal wear. Cobra does not specify tanning method; vegetable-tanned leather would pose no chemical risk. No contamination alerts on record.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Cobra Pur Tech glove combines leather on the palm (for grip and durability) with synthetic backing, likely polyester or nylon blended with spandex for stretch and moisture management. The 'Pur Tech' branding suggests performance coating, and the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish is almost certainly applied to the synthetic or leather surface to shed sweat and rain. water-repellent coating finishes on textiles are a common vector for PFAS, though formulations vary widely in their fluorine content and persistence.

The brand's record and disclosure

Cobra (owned by Puma/TaylorMade) does not publicly disclose PFAS use or water-repellent coating chemistry for its golf apparel. The brand has not published a PFAS elimination commitment or third-party certifications (e.g., Bluesign, OEKO-TEX) that would suggest fluorine-free water repellency. This silence is typical for mid-tier golf brands but contrasts with leading outdoor brands that now specify PFAS-free water-repellent coating. No major recalls or contamination incidents on record for Cobra gloves.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves are a small, lower-exposure category compared to outerwear, but they sit on skin and are handled frequently. Leather-palm synthetic-back gloves like this are standard; competitors (Titleist, FootJoy, Callaway) operate under similar disclosure gaps. Brands offering certified PFAS-free or fluorine-free water-repellent coating golf gloves are rare; most use traditional fluorochemical finishes without labeling.

If you buy it

Wash before first use if possible to reduce any residual coating treatments. Avoid heat (no dryer) and do not iron. Replace when the palm material tears, seams fail, or grip degrades, typically after 6-12 months of regular play. If you are sensitive to chemical finishes or concerned about PFAS exposure, contact Cobra directly to request water-repellent coating chemistry; lack of response may warrant switching to brands with transparent PFAS policies.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Cobra has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.