PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall28/ 100Poor
COBRA StormGrip Rain Womens Golf Gloves

Cobra · Golf Balls & Equipment

COBRA StormGrip Rain Womens Golf Gloves

Poor

Golf glove with water-repellent coating; PFAS risk unclear without disclosure.

Verdict · Skipwater-repellent coating chemistry unconfirmed; no major hazards established, but brand silence on PFAS and chemical disclosure warrants cautious use and regular replacement.

Golf glove with synthetic materials and water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment typical of performance gear. Cobra has not publicly disclosed PFAS-free status.

The better-graded swap

Top-Flite 2023 Gamer Golf Glo-Regular-Left Hand-X Large

Top Flite

Top-Flite 2023 Gamer Golf Glo-Regular-Left Hand-X Large

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic leather or microfiber with water-repellent water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Unknown whether Cobra uses fluorinated PFAS compounds or non-fluorinated alternatives for water repellency. Fluorinated water-repellent coating finishes can leach into skin sweat during prolonged wear; non-fluorinated alternatives are available but unconfirmed here. Brand silence prevents assessment.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

Degradation particulates from water-repellent coating loss

As the water-repellent finish wears with use and washing, fine particles can shed and be inhaled or absorbed. This is a time-limited hazard that occurs naturally over 1-2 years; frequent hand washing and replacement mitigate it.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin sensitization or irritation from finish residues

Pre-owned or unwashed gloves may leave water-repellent coating finish residues on skin during wear, especially in warm, sweaty conditions. Contact dermatitis risk is low but not ruled out; pre-washing reduces exposure significantly.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic microfiber and polyurethane coatings may contain formaldehyde-based binders or cross-linkers, but no recalls or alerts exist for COBRA golf gloves. This is a standard low-level occupational exposure risk in textile manufacturing, not a documented end-user hazard for this product.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes

Golf gloves in neutral colors (gray, black, white) typical of this product use minimal dye loads. No evidence of carcinogenic restricted azo dyes in Cobra's product line, though brand does not publish dye standards publicly.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

COBRA StormGrip gloves use synthetic microfiber or synthetic leather (likely polyurethane or polyester-based) with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. The water-repellent coating is the critical unknown, modern water-repellent textiles often use fluorinated compounds (PFAS) or, increasingly, non-fluorinated alternatives, but Cobra has not publicly disclosed which approach they use. The microfiber/synthetic base itself poses low acute hazard, but the finish chemistry determines long-term safety.

The brand's record and disclosure

Cobra (owned by Puma, now Sumitomo Rubber) has not made public commitments to PFAS-free textile production or disclosed chemical composition standards for apparel. The brand does not appear on major textile safety transparency initiatives (e.g., Greenpeace Detox, ZDHC Gateway). No established recalls or chemical-safety controversies have been documented for this specific glove line, but the absence of proactive disclosure is notable.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves are a niche apparel product where water-repellent coating treatment is functionally necessary. Most competitors (Titleist, FootJoy, TaylorMade) also apply water-repellent coating finishes without public PFAS declarations, making Cobra typical rather than distinctive. Premium golf apparel brands rarely lead on chemical transparency; this product is in the mainstream middle of the market.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water before first use to reduce any loose finish residues. Hand wash in mild detergent; avoid hot water or chlorine, which can degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially release finish particles. Replace every 1-2 seasons of regular use as the coating naturally degrades. Do not dry-clean, as perchloroethylene (PCE) solvent can interact unpredictably with fluorinated or non-fluorinated water-repellent coating finishes.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Cobra has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.