Columbia Men's Firecamp Boot
Skip until Columbia discloses waterproofing chemistry.
Columbia does not disclose PFAS status or waterproofing chemistry for this boot. Leather hiking boots typically use water-repellent coating treatments that may contain PFAS, but brand transparency is absent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Leather and textile with waterproof treatment
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
Aqua Pure
3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
What Columbia Men's Firecamp Boot is made of, ingredients and materials
The Firecamp Boot combines leather uppers with textile components and an applied waterproof treatment. The leather tanning process typically introduces chromium salts (standard in modern tanneries) and may include formaldehyde-based fixing agents. The textile lining and any synthetic overlays may contain azo dyes or synthetic dyes that carry heavy-metal pigment risks. The waterproof treatment is not specified by Columbia and is therefore presumed to contain fluorinated compounds (PFAS) based on industry-standard water-repellent coating finishes for leather boots, though this remains unconfirmed by the brand.
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Leather tanning and fabric dye-fixing may introduce formaldehyde-releasers. No independent test results for this specific model are on record. Exposure risk is highest during initial wearing and decreases with time and ventilation.
Source, ATSDR ↗Heavy metals
Synthetic textiles and leather dyeing in footwear routinely employ azo dyes and pigments that may contain cadmium, lead, or chromium. No safety testing specific to this boot is publicly available. Migration risk is low during wear but increases if the boot is heavily sweated or soaked.
Source, FDA ↗Chromium salts from leather tanning
Chrome tanning is the industry standard for leather boots and is present in nearly all commercial leather footwear. Trivalent chromium (Cr III) is considered less hazardous than hexavalent chromium (Cr VI), which is regulated. Skin contact during wear presents low risk if the leather is properly finished; contamination of sweat or abrasion injury could pose higher local exposure.
PFAS
Columbia does not specify the waterproof chemistry. water-repellent coating and similar water-repellent finishes on leather boots typically contain PFAS or fluorinated alternatives. This product's PFAS grade (20/100) reflects that uncertainty and the brand's silence on the issue. PFAS hazards are separately graded and detailed in the PFAS section.
Source, ATSDR ↗Off-gassing and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from finish curing
New leather footwear may release VOCs from tanning residues, dyes, and waterproofing agents during the first few weeks of storage and wear. Odor and mild respiratory irritation are typical during break-in. Airing the boots outdoors before first wear reduces this risk.
The full breakdown
The brand's record and disclosure
Columbia does not publicly disclose the chemistry of its waterproofing treatments across its footwear line, and has no established certification (such as Bluesign, GOTS, or OEKO-TEX) for chemical transparency in this product. The brand has faced no major recalls or public controversies specific to this boot model. However, the absence of disclosure on persistent water-repellent chemicals is a material gap in consumer information for a product marketed with waterproof features.
How it compares in its category
Most leather hiking and work boots in this market segment rely on water-repellent coating or similar water-repellent coatings, nearly all of which historically contained PFAS or PFAS alternatives of comparable persistence. Boots certified to OEKO-TEX Standard 100 or equivalent are rarer and typically more expensive. The Firecamp occupies a mainstream price and feature range; it is not distinguished by superior chemical transparency relative to competitors at the same price point.
If you buy it
Store in a cool, dry location away from prolonged heat or direct sunlight to minimize any off-gassing of finishing agents. Brush and wipe regularly with a damp cloth to remove dust and soil, reducing the need for chemical-intensive cleaners. Reapply waterproofing treatments only when water no longer beads on the leather, and use products labeled as PFAS-free if available. Inspect seams and the sole regularly; replace the boot when structural integrity fails (delamination, sole separation, or upper cracking), typically after 2-3 seasons of moderate use.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Columbia has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Boots
Mephisto
Men Mephisto Curt Mt SNEAKER
- leather, textile, rubber sole
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Volatile organic compounds (VOC) off-gassing from adhesives
Vasque
Hiking shoes Vasque Women's Horizon Mid
- Leather/nubuck upper, synthetic/rubber sole, no coating disclosed
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes (leather/textile coloring)
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore waterproof boots grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.