PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall8/ 100Bad
The North Face Women's Offtrail Hike LT Mid Gore-Tex Hiking Boots

The North Face · Waterproof Boots

The North Face Women's Offtrail Hike LT Mid Gore-Tex Hiking Boots

Bad

Gore-Tex boots inherently carry PFAS risk. Approach with caution.

Verdict: SkipGore-Tex waterproofing creates inherent PFAS exposure; no disclosure from The North Face; safe if maintained properly and replaced before breakdown.

Gore-Tex is a Teflon-family coating membrane engineered for waterproofing and widely recognized to contain PFAS compounds. The North Face makes no PFAS commitment or disclosure. Contact the brand or seek non-membrane alternatives.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Gore-Tex membrane (Teflon-family coating-based waterproof layer)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating/Teflon-family coating degradation and microparticle release

Gore-Tex membrane can degrade under mechanical stress, UV exposure, or heat, potentially releasing Teflon-type coating particles. No studies confirm microparticle inhalation risk from worn hiking boots specifically, but degraded waterproof textiles are a plausible source.

70/ 100
💨

Adhesive and polyurethane off-gassing

The bond between Gore-Tex and backing layers, and polyurethane midsole, can emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) especially if boots are wet or heated. Intensity is highest during first wear and after prolonged storage; well-ventilated use minimizes inhalation.

70/ 100
⚠️

Mold and bacterial growth in insole padding or collar

Repeated wet use and warm foot environment can promote fungal or bacterial colonization of foam padding and textile linings, especially if boots are not fully dried between uses. This is a hygiene risk, not a chemical hazard, but becomes likely with poor maintenance.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

The North Face does not disclose use of formaldehyde-based dyes or finishes in this boot. No recall or test result documents contamination, but synthetic leather and nylon uppers may contain residual formaldehyde from manufacturing.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes in colored textiles

The boot's colored synthetic upper may use azo dyes; restricted azo dyes are banned in EU footwear, but US regulation is weaker. The North Face does not certify this product against azo dye limits.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These boots use Gore-Tex, a Teflon-family coating-based membrane bonded to textile layers to repel water while allowing vapor escape. The Teflon-family coating chemistry that makes Gore-Tex water-resistant is the source of PFAS compounds, which are persistent in the environment and bioaccumulate in human tissue. The outer upper is likely synthetic leather or nylon with polyurethane backing; the insole and midsole may contain adhesives and foam that off-gas volatile compounds, especially when wet or heated. No public testing has documented specific PFAS variants in The North Face's boots, but the material class carries this risk by design.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face has not published specific PFAS content data for this product or its waterproof boot line. The parent company (VF Corporation) committed in 2020 to phasing PFAS in textile manufacturing, but implementation timelines and verification remain opaque. No recall or safety advisory exists for these boots. The brand does not certify this product against PFAS levels or disclose which PFAS-free alternatives (if any) exist in comparable models.

How it compares in its category

Most premium waterproof hiking boots (Salomon, Merrell, KEEN) also use Gore-Tex or similar Teflon-family coating membranes, so PFAS risk is category-wide rather than brand-specific. Some brands (Patagonia, Altra) have tested or committed to lower-PFAS alternatives, though performance trade-offs and availability are limited. Non-Gore-Tex waterproof boots exist (waxed leather, polyurethane coatings) but sacrifice breathability and durability in comparable price ranges. The North Face boots occupy the middle ground: reliable Gore-Tex performance without transparency.

If you buy it

Wear them in dry conditions first and allow 24-48 hours for any initial off-gassing before extended use. Clean the exterior after muddy or salty terrain to prevent adhesive or membrane degradation; do not machine wash or expose to heat sources (dryers, direct sun). Inspect the sole bond and upper stitching annually for separation; once delamination or cracking begins, discontinue use rather than attempt repair, as breakdown increases microparticle shedding. Replace every 300-500 miles or when structural integrity visibly declines.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
The North Face has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof boots grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.