PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Columbia Women's Hikebound II Long Jacket

Columbia · Rain Jackets

Columbia Women's Hikebound II Long Jacket

Bad

Contact Columbia directly. water-repellent coating jackets often use PFAS.

Verdict: SkipPolyester rain jacket with undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry poses PFAS uncertainty; no other established hazards on record. Contact Columbia or choose PFAS-free alternative.

The jacket uses a polyester shell with water-repellent finish, historically based on fluorinated compounds. Columbia hasn't stated whether it uses PFAS-free water repellency or published a phase-out commitment. No certification exists.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester shell with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

water-repellent coating finishes on rain jackets commonly use fluorocarbon chemistry; Columbia has not disclosed their treatment. PFAS exposure during wear is minimal, but manufacturing, washing, and disposal may release compounds into water.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and re-application hazard

If the water-repellent coating wears off, users may apply aftermarket water-repellent products, some of which contain PFAS or other fluorochemicals. This creates a secondary exposure pathway not present at purchase.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🫧

Microplastics

Polyester textiles release microfibers during washing and wear. This is a general concern for synthetic jackets but not specific to Columbia's Hikebound II or documented as a health hazard in field use.

Source: EPA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or public incidents tie Columbia's Hikebound II to formaldehyde finishes or azo-dye residues. Polyester typically does not retain these chemicals post-manufacture, though small amounts may persist if sizing agents are not fully removed.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No evidence of heavy metal contamination in Columbia rain jackets. Standard synthetic polyester dyes used in mainstream outerwear are not known to harbor lead, cadmium, or arsenic.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Hikebound II uses a polyester shell, a synthetic petroleum-derived fiber, paired with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. water-repellent coating treatments are the primary PFAS vector in rain jackets, as manufacturers historically rely on fluorocarbon chemistry to achieve water-shedding properties. Polyester itself is stable under normal wear and does not readily leach chemicals, but the water-repellent coating is the unknown variable here. Without Columbia's disclosure of their specific water-repellent coating chemistry (fluorocarbon-based, fluorocarbon-free, or hybrid), the PFAS risk cannot be ruled out.

The brand's record and disclosure

Columbia Sportswear has not publicly committed to PFAS-free water-repellent coating treatments across their rain jacket line and does not disclose specific water-repellent coating chemistries on product pages or labels. The company has faced no major recalls or public controversies tied to PFAS in outerwear, but their silence on this issue is notable given the industry trend toward transparency. No third-party certifications (such as Bluesign or GOTS) are typically associated with Columbia's mainstream rain jackets, limiting independent verification. Direct contact with Columbia customer service is the only way to confirm whether this specific model uses legacy fluorocarbon water-repellent coating or a newer alternative.

How it compares in its category

Rain jackets across most mainstream brands (North Face, Patagonia, REI Co-op) share the same PFAS uncertainty unless they explicitly market PFAS-free water-repellent coating. Patagonia has committed to phasing out fluorocarbon water-repellent coating, while REI's house brand offers PFAS-free options, making them more transparent peers. Columbia's Hikebound II sits in the mid-market price range without the added disclosure that justifies that positioning. For buyers prioritizing PFAS avoidance, this jacket offers no assurance over generic competitors.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently to preserve the water-repellent coating finish and avoid multiple re-applications that would increase cumulative chemical exposure. Use cool water and mild detergent, never dry-clean, and do not tumble dry at high heat (polyester can degrade above 140°F, potentially compromising the coating). Do not iron directly; hang dry in shade. If the water-repellency degrades noticeably after one or two seasons, evaluate whether re-treating with a commercial water-repellent coating product or replacing the jacket aligns with your PFAS tolerance.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Columbia has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.