PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad

Core Equipment · Camping Tents & Tarps

9 Person Instant Cabin Tent

Bad

Skip until brand discloses waterproof coating chemistry.

Verdict · SkipPolyester tent with undisclosed water-repellent coating and confirmed high PFAS risk; buy only if you accept coating chemistry uncertainty and commit to responsible disposal.

Core Equipment does not disclose the water-repellent coating used on this tent fabric. Instant cabin tents commonly use PFAS-based water repellents; without verification, PFAS risk cannot be ruled out.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester fabric with water-repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What 9 Person Instant Cabin Tent is made of, ingredients and materials

This tent is constructed from polyester fabric with an applied water-repellent coating. Polyester itself is a stable synthetic polymer with low leaching risk under normal use. The water-repellent coating is the chemical wild card, Core Equipment has not disclosed whether it contains PFAS (fluorinated compounds that shed into soil and water) or alternative durable water repellents. Without transparency, you cannot know the persistence and environmental fate of the finish.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Antimony trioxide is a common catalyst in polyester fiber production. It is not typically a leaching hazard during normal tent use because it is bound into the polymer matrix, but degraded or incinerated polyester can mobilize it. No specific testing data for Core tents is available.

70/ 100
⏳

Water-repellent coating degradation and leachate

All water-repellent coating finishes, whether fluorinated or non-fluorinated, degrade over time with UV and weathering. Reapplication or re-coating is common. Undisclosed coating chemistry means you cannot predict what degradation products may shed into groundwater or soil during the tent's life and after disposal.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester does not require formaldehyde-based finishing resins. No formaldehyde-containing treatments are standard in water-repellent coatings for this category; risk is not on record for Core tents.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Azo dyes

No specific information on dye chemistry for this tent fabric. Polyester textiles can be dyed with azo or non-azo colorants; Core does not disclose dye class. Risk is not established but also not ruled out without testing.

95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Recreational tents are not required to meet flammability standards in the U.S. and typically do not carry added flame retardants. Core does not market flame resistance; none is on record.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Core Equipment has made no public statement about coating chemistry, waterproofing standards (water-repellent coating certification, finish durability testing), or PFAS avoidance commitments. No major recalls or safety controversies are on record for this model. The silence on chemical composition is the primary red flag; responsible tent makers increasingly publish finish specifications and phase-out timelines for legacy fluorinated water-repellent coating.

How it compares in its category

Mid-range recreational tents routinely use fluorinated water-repellent coating finishes because they are durable and cost-effective. Premium and eco-conscious brands (including REI Co-op, Big Agnes, and Nemo) now offer polyester tents with wax-based, paraffin, or other non-fluorinated water repellents. This tent offers no performance or material advantage over alternatives with disclosed coatings; the lack of transparency is a genuine differentiator in the wrong direction.

If you buy it

Store it dry and well-ventilated to prevent mildew; do not machine wash or dry-clean, as solvents and heat degrade the coating and may mobilize finish chemicals. Inspect seams and patches annually; re-coat with a compatible product (ask Core for guidance, though they may not respond) rather than use proprietary sealants of unknown chemistry. At end of life, do not landfill if possible; contact Core or local waste management about textile recycling to limit coating leachate to soil. Assume a lifespan of 5-10 years depending on UV exposure and storage conditions.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Core Equipment has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More camping tents & tarps grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.