PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
Dunlop DigiTech All Weather Golf Glove Men's Left Small White CoolMax

Dunlop · Golf Balls & Equipment

Dunlop DigiTech All Weather Golf Glove Men's Left Small White CoolMax

Poor

Golf glove with water-repellent coating; PFAS in treatment unclear, limited disclosure.

Verdict · SkipCoolMax polyester glove with undisclosed water-repellent coating treatment poses moderate PFAS risk; no brand transparency on chemistry; proper laundering and replacement may reduce exposure.

Golf glove with CoolMax polyester fibers and water-repellent treatment. Dunlop makes no PFAS disclosures; water-repellent coating specifics remain unknown.

The better-graded swap

Bridgestone Tour B X Golf Balls

Bridgestone

Bridgestone Tour B X Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

CoolMax polyester blend with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

CoolMax polyester may contain trace antimony from the polymerization catalyst (antimony trioxide), though levels in finished apparel are typically well below regulatory concern thresholds. Skin contact risk from a glove is minimal due to the chemical being fixed in the polymer matrix. Standard concern for polyester textiles, not elevated for this brand or product.

70/ 100

water-repellent coating leachates and degradation by-products

The undisclosed water-repellent coating finish (likely fluorinated or hydrocarbon-based) can shed oligomers and by-products during washing, particularly in early laundering cycles. If PFAS-based, leaching is the primary exposure vector; if fluorocarbon-free, risk is lower but not zero. Hand-washing and avoiding heat reduce release.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

CoolMax polyester itself does not require formaldehyde-based wrinkle-resistance or durable-press treatments; no evidence of formaldehyde resin finishes in this glove product line. Risk is minimal unless the water-repellent coating formulation includes resin-based cross-linkers, which is not documented.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

The white colorway is achieved through the inherent lightness of CoolMax fiber rather than dye application. No azo dyes or heavy metal-containing pigments are typical for white polyester sports gloves. Risk is minimal for this product.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Fragrance allergens in production additives

No fragrance additives or scent treatments are standard in golf glove manufacturing. Risk of fragrance allergens is not a recognized issue for this product category unless the buyer applies personal products to the glove after purchase.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This glove is constructed from CoolMax, a polyester microfiber engineered for moisture-wicking and durability in sports applications. The material itself is stable polyester with no inherent lead, cadmium, or azo dye concerns typical of synthetic fabrics, but the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface is the chemical question mark. water-repellent coating coatings historically have relied on PFAS-based formulations, though some manufacturers have transitioned to PFAS-free alternatives without clear labeling. Dunlop does not publicly disclose whether this glove uses legacy PFAS-based or newer fluorocarbon-free water-repellent coating treatments.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dunlop, a subsidiary of Sumitomo Rubber, has not published detailed material transparency reports or PFAS phase-out commitments comparable to outdoor apparel leaders. No voluntary certifications (bluesign, GOTS, or similar) appear on this product. The brand has no known major recalls or chemical controversies on record for golf apparel, but silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is typical of the sports equipment sector rather than a red flag specific to Dunlop. Consumers seeking full supply-chain transparency may find limited detail from this brand.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves generally carry lower chemical risk than outerwear or footwear because they contact skin only over limited areas and for short durations. Most competitors (Titleist, FootJoy, TaylorMade) use similar CoolMax or nylon blends with water-repellent coating finishes and comparable disclosure practices. This Dunlop glove sits in the mainstream market segment where water-repellent coating chemistry is rarely specified; premium alternatives may offer PFAS-free certifications or greater material transparency, but at higher cost. For a basic sports glove, the hazard profile is moderate and category-typical.

If you buy it

Wash the glove by hand in cool water with mild detergent and avoid hot cycles, which can degrade the water-repellent coating and potentially mobilize any chemical residues. Dry flat or hang indoors away from direct heat or sunlight. Replace the glove when the water-repellent coating finish visibly breaks down (water no longer beads on the surface) or the grip deteriorates, typically after one to two seasons of regular use. Do not dry-clean or tumble-dry, as heat and solvents can alter the coating; gentle laundering minimizes any leaching risk from the treatment.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Dunlop has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.