Dunlop · Golf Balls & Equipment
Dunlop Digitech All Weather Golf Glove Mens Left Large Dupont Coolmax
Golf glove water-repellent treatment PFAS status unclear.
Dunlop does not disclose PFAS content or water-repellent coating chemistry on this all-weather glove that typically uses water-repellent coatings.
The better-graded swap
Honma
HONMA GOLF D1 2022 GOLF Ball
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
DuPont Coolmax polyester blend with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
water-repellent coating particle shedding and inhalation
As the water-repellent coating finish degrades over time, small coated particles may shed into the hand and potentially be inhaled if the glove is handled roughly or stored near the face. The specific composition (PFAS vs. PFAS-free) is undisclosed, so particle risk profile cannot be fully assessed.
What’s reassuring
Azo dyes (colorfast toxins)
No recalls or reports of banned azo dyes in Dunlop golf gloves. Polyester gloves dyed with standard commercial colorants are unlikely to migrate onto skin under normal sweating and wear, but no independent testing of this glove model is on record.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Coolmax polyester does not typically require formaldehyde-releasing resins for finishing. No formaldehyde complaints have been reported for Dunlop golf gloves in public records.
Source, ATSDR ↗Antimony in polyester fiber
Antimony trioxide is sometimes used as a catalyst in polyester synthesis and can leach in trace amounts. No known reports of antimony leaching from Dunlop or other golf glove brands; skin contact during short, intermittent use poses negligible exposure risk.
Skin sensitization or irritation from finish or dyes
No documented cases of contact dermatitis or allergic reactions linked to Dunlop golf gloves. Polyester and standard water-repellent coating treatments are generally well-tolerated, but individual sensitivity varies. Patch-test on a small area of skin if you have sensitive hands.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This glove is constructed from DuPont Coolmax, a polyester microfiber blend engineered for moisture-wicking and breathability in athletic wear. The glove includes a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer surface to shed water on the golf course. water-repellent coating coatings historically rely on fluorinated compounds (PFAS), though some manufacturers now use PFAS-free alternatives; Dunlop has not disclosed which type is used here. Polyester itself is stable and poses minimal leaching risk under normal wear conditions.
The brand's record and disclosure
Dunlop is a subsidiary of Sumitomo Rubber Industries and produces sporting goods globally with no public record of major textile safety recalls or formaldehyde/azo dye violations. The brand does not publish detailed material safety disclosures, restricted substance lists, or PFAS commitments on its website or product labeling. No independent certifications (such as Oeko-Tex Standard 100) are mentioned for this glove model. Dunlop's silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is typical for sports-apparel brands but leaves end-user PFAS exposure unquantified.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves are a niche apparel subcategory with fewer safety certifications and public scrutiny than mainstream athletic wear. Most branded golf gloves (Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade) similarly lack PFAS transparency on water-repellent coating treatments. Polyester-based construction is standard; Coolmax microfiber is considered a premium, non-toxic variant. This product sits in the mid-to-premium tier for golf gloves and carries typical water-repellent coating opacity risks common across the segment.
If you buy it
Hand-wash in cool water and mild detergent to preserve the water-repellent coating and avoid accelerating any finish breakdown. Do not machine wash, bleach, or dry-clean, as these can compromise the water-repellent layer and potentially release coated particles. Replace when the grip degrades or water no longer beads on the palm surface, typically after 1-2 seasons of regular play. Store in a dry location; mold or mildew is a greater practical risk than chemical leaching during normal use.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Dunlop has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment
Vice Golf
Vice Drip Golf Balls
synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover
PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Bridgestone
Men's Pair Golf Gloves
Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend
Chromium in leather tanning residue
Limited concern
Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components
Limited concern
Heavy metals
Limited concern
Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
Bridgestone
Lady Golf Glove
Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Limited concern
Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather
Limited concern
Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.
⚠Brand says nothing about PFAS
More golf balls & equipment grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.