PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall8/ 100Bad
Dunlop Men’s Left Hand Golf Glove, Xl All-weather Dupont Coolmax

Dunlop · Golf Balls & Equipment

Dunlop Men’s Left Hand Golf Glove, Xl All-weather Dupont Coolmax

Poor

All-weather gloves often use water-repellent coating coatings; Dunlop discloses nothing on PFAS.

Verdict · SkipDupont Coolmax polyester with undisclosed all-weather treatment poses likely PFAS exposure; non-PFAS hazards minimal but all-weather durability unverified long-term.

All-weather golf glove with CoolMax polyester and water-repellent treatment. Dunlop does not disclose PFAS status or third-party verification.

The better-graded swap

Nike Golf Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

Nike Golf

Nike Golf Ball Mix - 1 Dozen Good

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Dupont Coolmax polyester blend, all-weather treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

All-weather finish almost certainly involves PFAS-based water-repellent coating; Dunlop provides no alternative specification, making fluorine presence the most probable scenario for this product class.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-based resins are sometimes used in polyester finishing and wrinkle resistance treatments. Dunlop does not disclose finishing chemistry, so presence cannot be ruled out, though polyester gloves generally require less formaldehyde than cotton blends.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding during washing

Coolmax microfibers, like all synthetic textiles, shed during laundering. This is not a direct health hazard to the wearer but an environmental concern; washing in cold water and limiting machine cycles reduces release.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in polyester

No specific recalls or reports of restricted azo dyes in Dunlop Coolmax gloves. Standard polyester apparel manufacturing in developed markets typically avoids banned azo compounds, though independent testing of this product is not on record.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony trioxide is a known catalyst in polyester manufacturing. No specific contamination reports exist for Dunlop Coolmax gloves, and regulatory limits apply in most markets where this product is sold.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This glove is constructed from Dupont Coolmax, a polyester microfiber engineered for moisture-wicking and breathability. Polyester itself carries minimal intrinsic toxicity at the fiber level, but the 'all-weather' finish is the concern, manufacturers typically apply water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coatings to polyester gloves, which historically relied on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve water and oil resistance. Dunlop's product description does not specify the water-repellent coating chemistry, leaving the fluorine status unknown.

The brand's record and disclosure

Dunlop (owned by Sumitomo Rubber) does not publicly disclose PFAS presence, phase-out commitments, or alternative water-repellent coating technologies for this glove line. No recalls or safety warnings for this specific product are on record. The brand has not published environmental or chemical transparency reports that would clarify treatment protocols, making independent verification impossible based on available information.

How it compares in its category

Most all-weather golf gloves rely on water-repellent coating finishes; this product is typical in that regard. Competitors like Titleist and Callaway have similarly maintained public silence on PFAS. Uncoated or minimally treated leather or synthetic alternatives exist but sacrifice the all-weather performance this glove promises. The Coolmax fiber itself is mainstream and poses no documented hazard above standard polyester apparel.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cool water to limit microfiber shedding into waterways; avoid high-heat drying (air dry instead). Replace when water-repellent coating performance visibly degrades (water no longer beads on surface), typically after 1-2 seasons of regular play. Do not assume 'all-weather' means indefinite durability; expect coating wear over time. Store in a dry location to extend water-repellent coating lifespan.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 55% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Dunlop has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.