PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
FootJoy HyperFLX Golf Glove

FootJoy · Golf Balls & Equipment

FootJoy HyperFLX Golf Glove

Poor

Water-resistant glove likely using water-repellent coating; brand silent on PFAS.

Verdict · SkipSynthetic leather golf glove with likely water-repellent coating presents possible PFAS exposure; no major brand safety controversies, but water-repellent coating chemistry and material durability require informed use.

Synthetic leather with water-repellent coating finish. FootJoy doesn't disclose PFAS or Teflon-family coating ingredients.

The better-graded swap

Volvik Marvel Gift Set 2.0 Distance Golf Balls Captain America

Volvik

Volvik Marvel Gift Set 2.0 Distance Golf Balls Captain America

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic leather with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100

water-repellent coating leachables and degradation

Water-repellent finishes on synthetic leather gloves often contain fluorinated or other persistent chemical compounds. When coating degrades under sweat, friction, or washing, particles and residues may migrate onto skin or into wash water; no brand-specific data for HyperFLX is on record.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic material

As synthetic leather ages and water-repellent coating breaks down, friction during use or washing may release microfibers. Glove use is localized to hand area and washing is infrequent, but cumulative shedding over the glove's lifespan is possible and difficult to quantify without product-specific testing.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Synthetic leather plasticizers (polyurethane/PVC)

Synthetic leather in golf gloves is generally stable during use and well-tolerated against skin. Phthalate content is not a documented concern for this product category, though PVC formulations can vary by supplier; no recalls or health complaints specific to FootJoy gloves have been established.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic leather and water-repellent coating finishes may contain trace formaldehyde-releasing cross-linkers, but levels are typically low in finished apparel. No testing data or complaints specific to HyperFLX gloves is publicly available; direct skin contact with gloves is limited and intermittent.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes in colorants

Golf gloves are not known to use problematic azo dyes; FootJoy HyperFLX does not carry Bluesign or similar certification but operates under standard apparel manufacturing. No specific azo dye concerns have been reported for this brand or product line.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

FootJoy HyperFLX uses synthetic leather (typically polyurethane or PVC-based) rather than genuine leather, paired with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. The water-repellent coating is the primary chemical concern in this product class, as such finishes historically rely on fluorinated compounds to achieve water resistance. Synthetic leather itself is generally stable during normal use, but the water-repellent coating layer can degrade with washing, heat exposure, or friction, potentially releasing particles or absorbed chemicals. The glove's grip and flexibility depend on plasticizers and polymeric binders that are industry-standard but warrant conscious care.

The brand's record and disclosure

FootJoy (a Acushnet Holdings subsidiary) has not published detailed ingredient disclosure or PFAS elimination timelines as of public record. The brand is not known for major safety recalls specific to glove chemistry, but transparency on water-repellent coating formulations is absent from their marketing materials and available safety documentation. FootJoy has focused marketing on performance and comfort rather than chemical safety, which is typical in sports apparel but leaves consumers without clear guidance on water-repellent coating composition. No third-party certifications (such as Bluesign or GOTS) are commonly associated with this product line.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves in this price and performance tier typically use synthetic leather with water-repellent coating finishes; FootJoy's offering is representative rather than differentiated on safety grounds. Competitors (Callaway, TaylorMade, Titleist) similarly lack public PFAS commitment statements for apparel. Natural leather alternatives exist but require different care protocols and may still carry water-repellent coating treatments. Premium brands increasingly highlight durability and water resistance without naming chemistry, suggesting industry-wide reluctance to specify water-repellent coating agents.

If you buy it

Rotate gloves to minimize single-glove degradation and water-repellent coating breakdown. Avoid hot water and direct heat (e.g., car dashboards, washers); hand wash or spot clean only, then air dry flat. Replace when the grip surface becomes slick, seams fray, or the water-repellent coating visibly breaks down (white streaking or water no longer beading). Store in a dry, cool place away from direct sunlight to slow material deterioration and chemical migration.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
FootJoy has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.