PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall8/ 100Bad
FootJoy WeatherSof 2 Pack Golf Gloves

FootJoy · Golf Balls & Equipment

FootJoy WeatherSof 2 Pack Golf Gloves

Poor

Water-repellent glove with water-repellent coating; PFAS status undisclosed.

Verdict · SkipLeather golf gloves with undisclosed water-repellent coating treatment; PFAS likely present but FootJoy silent; no other hazards documented; acceptable with awareness of water-repellent coating origin.

Leather and synthetic with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment. FootJoy doesn't disclose PFAS or test results.

The better-graded swap

Top Flite Women's Aura Golf Glove

Top Flite

Top Flite Women's Aura Golf Glove

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Leather/synthetic with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Golf glove water-repellent coating treatments are typically Teflon-family coating-based and commonly contain PFOA, PFOS, or GenX analogs. FootJoy does not disclose which fluorochemical is used, so PFAS presence is inferred from standard industry practice. Skin contact risk is lower than ingestion, but hand-to-mouth transfer is possible during play.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
💨

Synthetic backing VOC off-gassing

Polyester or nylon backing may emit trace VOCs, particularly in new product. This is typical for synthetic textiles and dissipates after initial use and airing out. No product-specific testing available.

70/ 100
🫧

water-repellent coating degradation and microfiber shedding

As water-repellent coating finishes wear (typically after 12-24 months), they can shed microparticles into wash water. This is an end-of-life concern rather than acute hazard, but contributes to cumulative microfiber pollution if gloves are washed frequently.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or test results document heavy metal contamination (chromium, lead) in FootJoy gloves. Standard tannery practices in developed nations use compliant chromium levels, but undisclosed sourcing of leather makes independent verification impossible.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Azo dyes in leather or synthetic coloring

FootJoy WeatherSof gloves are typically available in black, white, and natural leather tones. Standard leather tanneries and synthetic manufacturers comply with azo dye restrictions in developed supply chains, but no third-party certification is visible for this product.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

FootJoy WeatherSof gloves combine leather (likely sheepskin or goat leather for the palm/fingers) with synthetic backing, treated with a water-repellent durable-water-repellent (water-repellent coating) finish. water-repellent coating coatings are typically Teflon-family coating-based formulations designed to shed water without waterproofing completely, allowing breathability. The synthetic components are not specified in available product documentation but are standard polyester or nylon blends in golf gloves. The water-repellent coating treatment is the primary chemical exposure point.

The brand's record and disclosure

FootJoy (owned by Acushnet Holdings) does not publicly disclose PFAS content or use in their glove treatments, nor do they publish certifications such as BLUESIGN, Cradle to Cradle, or OEKO-TEX for this product line. The brand has not faced public recalls or safety controversies related to glove chemistry, but transparency on water-repellent additives is absent from their marketing and safety documentation. No independent testing results specific to FootJoy WeatherSof gloves are on record.

How it compares in its category

Most premium golf gloves use water-repellent coating treatments as standard; FootJoy WeatherSof is mainstream in this respect. Competitors like TaylorMade, Callaway, and PGA Tour Preferred typically do not disclose PFAS status either, making this a category-wide transparency gap. Budget alternatives sometimes use simpler wax or silicone coatings instead of Teflon-family coating water-repellent coating, which would reduce PFAS risk but may reduce water-repellent durability. Disclosure is not a competitive differentiator in golf apparel.

If you buy it

Wash gloves in cool water with mild soap when visibly soiled; avoid high heat or machine drying, as this can accelerate water-repellent coating breakdown and odor absorption in leather. Replace gloves when grip deteriorates or leather cracks (typically 12-18 months of regular play depending on climate and frequency). Do not soak or bleach. Store in a breathable pouch to prevent mildew in the synthetic backing. If you are concerned about PFAS exposure, contact FootJoy directly to request disclosure of water-repellent coating chemistry or consider non-water-repellent coating-treated leather alternatives.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
FootJoy has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.