PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
LITA Greenfield Artificial Grass Turf

LITA · Artificial Turf

LITA Greenfield Artificial Grass Turf

Poor

Wait for brand to disclose water and stain treatment composition.

Verdict · SkipArtificial turf carries flame retardant and off-gassing risks; GreenFields silent on PFAS treatment. Buy only if budget allows replacement in 5-7 years and installation minimizes child/pet contact.

Artificial turf typically uses water-resistant and stain-resistant coatings for outdoor durability. GreenFields refuses to discuss PFAS in treatments or provide third-party testing.

The better-graded swap

Multi Sport Turf

Multi Sport Turf

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyethylene or polypropylene fibers with backing and coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Artificial turf infill (crumb rubber, sand treatment) and polyurethane backing commonly contain brominated or chlorinated flame retardants to meet CPSC flammability standards. Exposure via hand-to-mouth contact (especially children) or dust inhalation is possible but limited outdoors; indoor or partially enclosed use increases risk.

Source, EPA
20/ 100
💨

VOC off-gassing from adhesives and coatings

Latex and polyurethane backing adhesives release VOCs (formaldehyde, toluene, xylene) especially during cure and under heat. GreenFields provides no off-gas testing data. Peak exposure occurs in first weeks post-installation; outdoor installation with wind dispersal significantly reduces inhalation risk compared to indoor use.

45/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from fiber degradation

PE and PP fibers degrade under UV and temperature cycling, releasing microplastics into soil and groundwater over 7-10 years. This is a systemic problem with all synthetic turf, not specific to GreenFields, but accelerates if backing degrades or infill becomes compacted and immobilized.

70/ 100
⚠️

Mold and bacterial growth in wet backing

Polyurethane and latex backing retain moisture in humid climates or high-rainfall regions. Inadequate drainage or poor installation can foster mold colonies, which produce allergenic spores. Regular rinsing and ensuring proper subsurface drainage mitigates this risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No documented lead or cadmium contamination reported in synthetic turf pigments or crumb rubber infill for this brand. However, recycled rubber infill sourcing is opaque industry-wide; independent testing of specific infill batches is rare.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

LITA Greenfield turf uses polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP) fibers bonded to a latex or polyurethane backing, often with infill materials like crumb rubber or sand. These synthetic polymers are inherently stable once cured, but the adhesives, backing coatings, and infill can off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during installation and weathering. PE and PP themselves don't leach endocrine disruptors like BPA, but the manufacturing process may leave residual monomers or plasticizers that migrate under UV exposure or temperature cycling.

The brand's record and disclosure

GreenFields does not publicly disclose PFAS-based water or stain treatments, backing adhesive composition, or VOC emissions testing. The brand has no posted third-party certifications (e.g., GOTS, Oeko-Tex, ASTM standards for turf). No major recalls or documented health complaints are on record for this specific product line. This silence on chemical inputs is the primary concern for long-term safety assessment.

How it compares in its category

Artificial turf as a category carries higher flame retardant exposure than most furniture because infill materials (recycled rubber crumb, sometimes treated sand) often contain brominated or chlorinated flame retardants to meet flammability codes. LITA Greenfield is mid-range, cheaper than certified eco-turf brands that publish VOC data, but lacks the transparency of premium competitors. Natural grass eliminates these concerns but requires maintenance and pesticide risk; synthetic turf trades chemical input for durability.

If you buy it

Allow 48-72 hours of ventilation and heavy rain after installation to reduce off-gassing before intensive foot traffic. Rinse infill and fibers regularly to remove dust and weathered particles. Monitor for degradation (pilling, fiber loss, backing separation) every 2-3 years; replace if backing breaks down or off-odor returns, as this signals coating failure. Limit use by infants crawling directly on untreated backing; use barrier matting in play zones.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
LITA has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Artificial Turf

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

AstroTurf

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

Polypropylene (PP) astroturf

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade35Poor
💨

VOC off-gassing from polyurethane or latex adhesive

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polypropylene UV degradation and microplastic shedding

High concern

20
⚠️

Backing adhesive failure and fiber separation

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Infill contamination (if rubber granules used)

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; polypropylene rarely requires PFAS, but no brand disclosure on treatments.

Starting grade for this product type

LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length

LITA

ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length

Synthetic turf fibers (polyethylene/polypropylene backing)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade53Good
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from fibers

Moderate concern

45
⛏️

Leaching from backing polymers or adhesives

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Infill contamination (if sand or crumb used)

Limited concern

70

Wait for brand to disclose turf composition; synthetic turf historically may use PFAS.

Starting grade for this product type

Multi Sport Turf

Multi Sport Turf

synthetic turf (polyethylene/polypropylene fibers, infill material unspecified)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade49Poor
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Undisclosed infill composition and leachates

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Fiber degradation and microplastic generation

Limited concern

70
💨

Volatile organic compound off-gassing during installation

Limited concern

70

Insufficient brand disclosure.

Starting grade for this product type

More artificial turf grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.