PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad

Hammock Gear · Camping Tents & Tarps

Hearth Underquilt

Bad

Underquilt uses unknown waterproof coating; brand silent on PFAS.

Verdict · SkipUnquantified PFAS coating plus silent brand stance creates uncertainty; non-PFAS hazards are low-concern for this material class, but full transparency is missing.

Hammock Gear does not disclose PFAS status or coating chemistry for this underquilt. Synthetic insulated quilts often use water-repellent coating finishes that may contain PFAS, but this product's specific treatment is unspecified.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic insulation with unspecified water-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Hearth Underquilt is made of, ingredients and materials

The Hearth Underquilt uses synthetic insulation (likely polyester or nylon fibers) with an unspecified water-resistant coating applied to the outer shell. The coating's chemistry is not disclosed by the brand, which is the critical unknown, water-resistant treatments on outdoor textiles often rely on PFAS (fluorocarbon compounds) or, less commonly, wax-based or silicone alternatives. Without confirmation of the coating type, users cannot assess whether they are exposed to PFAS during use, care, or eventual disposal.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-resistant finish chemistry is unspecified. Historical norm in outdoor textiles is PFAS-based treatment, but brand has not confirmed or denied. No independent testing result on record for this product.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic insulation

Synthetic insulation fibers can shed microplastics during washing or use, particularly if the outer shell coating degrades. Concern is environmental rather than direct health risk to user, but relevant for lifecycle assessment.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic insulation fibers (polyester/nylon) may receive durable press or antimicrobial finishes in manufacturing, but no formaldehyde-based treatment is on record for Hammock Gear products or typical underquilt specifications. Unlikely hazard in this context.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester insulation

Antimony trioxide is a catalyst used in polyester production, but residual levels in finished consumer textiles are tightly regulated and rarely detected above trace amounts. No specific concern reported for this brand or product category.

95/ 100
✅

Azo dyes in synthetic shell or insulation

Underquilts are typically neutral colors (black, gray, olive) achievable with non-azo dyes or disperse dyes; no hazard on record for this product or material class.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Hammock Gear has not publicly disclosed the chemistry of the water-resistant coating on this product or stated a PFAS policy. This silence is notable in a market segment (outdoor/camping gear) where some competitors have begun transparency statements or committed to PFAS-free alternatives. The brand offers no visible third-party certifications (Bluesign, OEKO-TEX, or similar) that would indicate independent screening for restricted chemicals. Absence of disclosure does not confirm the presence of PFAS, but it prevents informed choice.

How it compares in its category

Outdoor underquilts and insulated camping layers represent a niche segment where water-resistant coatings are functional necessities. Many mainstream brands in this space (REI, Patagonia) have begun phasing PFAS or publishing coating chemistry. Hammock Gear is a smaller, direct-to-consumer brand with less public accountability infrastructure. The lack of transparency is more notable because competing products in the underquilt category increasingly label coating type or PFAS status, making Hammock Gear's silence a relative disadvantage for risk-conscious buyers.

If you buy it

Contact Hammock Gear directly to request the specific coating chemistry; most manufacturers can provide this information even if not publicly listed. Wash the underquilt in cool water before first use if you wish to reduce potential leachable residues (though efficacy depends on coating type). Avoid high-heat drying and prolonged direct sunlight, as thermal stress can degrade coatings and potentially release volatile compounds. Store dry; prolonged dampness can promote microbial growth in the insulation rather than chemical degradation of the shell.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Hammock Gear has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More camping tents & tarps grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.