PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall3/ 100Bad
Wilton Parchment Paper Mega Roll

Wilton · Parchment Paper & Baking Liners

Wilton Parchment Paper Mega Roll

Poor

Parchment's grease-resistance treatment requires clarification on PFAS status.

Verdict · SkipSilicone-coated parchment with undisclosed PFAS treatment and no third-party certification; acceptable for occasional use below 420°F with caution.

Wilton parchment is typically silicone-coated for heat and grease resistance. The brand offers no PFAS disclosure or third-party certification, though grease-resistant coatings sometimes use PFAS.

The better-graded swap

If You Care Parchment Baking Paper

If You Care

If You Care Parchment Baking Paper

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Silicone-coated paper with grease-resistant treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Fluorochemical coating degradation at high heat

Silicone-coated parchment may release volatile organic compounds or degrade fluorochemical binders above 420-450°F. No published data on Hefty brand specifically, but this is a material class concern not unique to this product.

70/ 100
♾️

Unidentified fluorochemical exposure via food contact

Grease-resistant treatment almost certainly contains fluorochemicals (PFAS subset); brand silence on composition means consumers cannot assess individual PFAS risk (chain length, bioaccumulation profile, volatility). This is the primary hazard flagged in the PFAS rating.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

Microplastic or coating particle migration to food

No documented cases of Wilton or Hefty parchment shedding particles into food at normal use temperatures. Risk increases if paper is crumpled, torn, or heated unevenly; visual inspection before each use mitigates.

95/ 100

Chlorine bleaching residues in paper substrate

Most commodity parchment paper is made from virgin pulp and may be chlorine-bleached during manufacture. Hefty does not disclose bleaching method; residual chlorine compounds are not known to leach into food at baking temperatures.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Wilton Parchment Paper Mega Roll is paper coated with silicone to provide non-stick and grease-resistant properties. The grease resistance typically requires fluorochemical treatment, which raises PFAS concern (separately graded as Poor). Silicone itself is inert at normal baking temperatures, but the underlying treatment chemistry is not fully disclosed by Hefty, making full safety assessment difficult. The paper substrate itself carries minimal risk if unbleached or minimally processed.

The brand's record and disclosure

Hefty (owned by Reynolds Consumer Products) does not publicly disclose the specific fluorochemical composition of its parchment coatings or commit to PFAS-free alternatives. No independent certifications (e.g., Nordic Swan, EU Ecolabel, or third-party testing for fluorochemicals) are advertised on this product. The brand has not faced documented recalls for parchment paper, but lack of transparency on chemical treatment is a notable gap in consumer communication compared to premium competitors.

How it compares in its category

Most conventional parchment papers (Wilton, Reynolds, store brands) rely on fluorochemical coatings for grease resistance and perform identically in kitchen use. Silicone-coated parchment dominates the market and is not a material linked to PFAS at typical baking temperatures. Premium alternatives like If You Care or Katazayas markets parchment with plant-based coatings or explicit PFAS-free claims, though they cost more. This Hefty product is functionally standard but offers no disclosure advantage.

If you buy it

Use below 420°F to avoid silicone degradation and potential volatilization of coating compounds. Discard if coating shows discoloration, peeling, or burns. Replace the roll every 1-2 years and store in a cool, dry place away from heat to prevent coating breakdown. Do not reuse sheets; single-use presents lower concern given the unknown fluorochemical load and potential microscopic wear over repeated heating cycles.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Wilton has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Parchment Paper & Baking Liners

If You Care Parchment Baking Paper

If You Care

Parchment Baking Paper

bleached paper with undisclosed grease-resistant coating

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70

Brand no-added-PFAS claim and a 2021 lab result with no fluorine detected.

Lab test found no PFAS

If You Care Parchment Baking Sheets

If You Care

Parchment Baking Sheets

bleached paper with silicone coating

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent

Paper degradation and fragmentation

Limited concern

70

Brand no-added-PFAS claim and a 2021 lab result with no fluorine detected.

Lab test found no PFAS

Parchment Baking Sheets

If You Care

Parchment Baking Sheets

unbleached paper with silicone coating

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent

Silicone coating degradation at high heat

Limited concern

70

Brand no-added-PFAS claim and a 2021 lab result with no fluorine detected.

Lab test found no PFAS

More parchment paper & baking liners grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.