PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall10/ 100Bad
Honma Golf Glove For Men Left Hand, All Weather Breathable Small

Honma · Golf Balls & Equipment

Honma Golf Glove For Men Left Hand, All Weather Breathable Small

Poor

All-weather glove likely treated; PFAS risk unknown, manufacturer silent.

Verdict · SkipSynthetic leather glove with unknown PFAS water-treatment; monitor for skin irritation, replace if coating degrades, avoid high heat.

All-weather breathable golf glove with synthetic materials and water-resistant finish, typically using water-repellent coating coatings. Honma discloses no PFAS information.

The better-graded swap

Cobra PUR Tour

Cobra

Cobra PUR Tour

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

synthetic leather or polyurethane with water-resistant finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Vague safety claims only

Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
💨

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) off-gassing from polyurethane

Polyurethane synthetic leather and adhesives can emit VOCs, particularly in the first days of use. Off-gassing is typically mild for gloves (small surface area) but may trigger headache or respiratory irritation in sensitive individuals in enclosed spaces.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin contact irritation from finishing agents or adhesive residue

Water-resistant topcoats and polyurethane adhesives may contain uncrosslinked monomers or residual solvents that can cause contact dermatitis with prolonged skin contact. Honma does not disclose these components, so risk cannot be ruled out.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and plasticizer leaching over time

Synthetic leather topcoats can soften, crack, or become tacky with age or heat exposure, especially in humid storage. Degradation may release phthalates or other plasticizers that transfer to skin during use.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

All-weather glove coatings almost universally rely on fluorinated PFAS or fluorine-free alternatives; Honma's silence on this suggests conventional PFAS treatment, but no test data confirms this product specifically.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in synthetic leather coloring

No azo dye restrictions are standard in golf glove manufacturing, and Honma provides no testing data. If present, restricted azo dyes (producing carcinogenic amines) are unlikely in a premium brand, but absence of certification leaves it unverified.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This glove uses synthetic leather (likely polyurethane or PVC) with a water-resistant topcoat finish. Synthetic leather avoids animal-derived hazards but introduces polymer-based chemistry, polyurethane can off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during curing and initial use, while water-resistant coatings on athletic gloves are commonly treated with fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to repel moisture. The specific resin and coating composition from Honma is not disclosed in available product documentation.

The brand's record and disclosure

Honma is a Japanese golf equipment manufacturer with limited public transparency on material safety or chemical content. No independent certifications (OEKO-TEX, GOTS) or PFAS disclosure statements are evident for their glove lines. The brand does not publish material safety data sheets or supply-chain chemical policies, which is typical of many golf accessory brands but limits consumer verification of hazard mitigation.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves occupy a middle-risk position in apparel. Unlike base-layer textiles with potential formaldehyde finishes or flame retardants, gloves face less regulatory scrutiny. However, water-resistant athletic gloves are more likely to contain PFAS than non-treated cotton alternatives. Brands offering PFAS-free water repellency (e.g., via wax or silicone without fluorine) are rare and typically cost more; most all-weather gloves assume PFAS treatment.

If you buy it

Air out the glove for 24-48 hours after purchase to allow initial VOC off-gassing. Wash in cool water before first use to remove any loose finishing residues. Avoid prolonged exposure to temperatures above 60 degrees Celsius (140F), as synthetic leather can degrade and release plasticizers. Replace gloves if the coating becomes sticky, cracked, or develops odor, signaling breakdown of the topcoat. Inspect hands periodically for unexplained irritation or contact dermatitis.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Honma has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.