PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall14/ 100Bad
Malbon Golf X Honma Men Performance Glove

Honma · Golf Balls & Equipment

Malbon Golf X Honma Men Performance Glove

Poor

Golf glove waterproofing likely contains water-repellent coating; PFAS undisclosed by brand.

Verdict · SkipSynthetic leather golf glove with undisclosed water-repellent treatment likely containing PFAS; no other established hazards documented, but brand transparency is poor.

Performance golf glove with synthetic leather or polyurethane and moisture-wicking treatment, typically using water-repellent coating water-repellent coatings. Honma provides no PFAS disclosure.

The better-graded swap

Spalding Top Flite Xl High Trajectory Golf Balls Set Of 12 - In Box

Spalding

Spalding Top Flite Xl High Trajectory Golf Balls Set Of 12 - In Box

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

synthetic leather/polyurethane blend with moisture-wicking treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Polyurethane synthetic leather water-proofing in golf gloves routinely uses fluorinated PFAS compounds (e.g., C6/C8 PFOA analogs) to achieve quick-dry and moisture-barrier performance. Honma has not disclosed the specific formulation or PFAS class used; this is graded separately at 20/100 safety.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100

Polyurethane Degradation and Leachable Additives

Over time, polyurethane can break down, especially with moisture and heat exposure, potentially releasing plasticizers or residual monomers (isocyanates). Honma does not disclose stabilizer or plasticizer chemistry; risk is low during normal wear but increases if glove is subjected to high heat or prolonged wet storage.

70/ 100
⚠️

Allergic Contact Dermatitis from Treatment Chemicals

Users with sensitive skin may react to residual treatment chemicals, dyes, or adhesives on the glove surface. No cases are documented for Honma products specifically; risk is typical for synthetic leather apparel.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic leather bonding sometimes uses formaldehyde-based adhesives; however, no public testing or recalls document formaldehyde release in Honma gloves. Dermal contact exposure would be minimal during normal wear unless glove is heated.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo Dyes in Color/Pigment

Synthetic leather is dyed, and azo dyes are common in apparel; no specific testing or concern has been reported for Honma golf gloves. Risk of dermal sensitization exists only if dyes are non-compliant with EU/REACH restrictions, which is not documented.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This glove uses a polyurethane-synthetic leather blend, which mimics leather durability without animal sourcing. The moisture-wicking treatment is standard for golf gloves to manage grip and sweat in humid play conditions. Polyurethane itself is chemically stable during normal wear, but the water-repellent finish applied to synthetic leather almost certainly relies on fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to achieve durability and fast-drying performance, a common practice across sports and outdoor apparel that brands rarely disclose.

The brand's record and disclosure

Honma is a Japanese golf equipment manufacturer with limited public transparency on chemical composition or safety certifications. The brand has not issued statements regarding PFAS use, PFOA phase-out timelines, or restricted substance lists. No major safety recalls or chemical controversies are on public record for Honma apparel products, but the silence on water-repellent treatment ingredients reflects an industry-wide pattern of non-disclosure rather than assurance of safety.

How it compares in its category

Most performance golf gloves use synthetic leather with similar moisture-management treatments; Honma's product is typical in this respect, not notably better or worse on transparency. Leading outdoor apparel brands (Arc'teryx, Patagonia) now disclose PFAS use or commit to phase-out; Honma has made no such statements. For golfers seeking lower-chemical alternatives, leather gloves treated only with wax or silicone (without fluorinated water-repellent coating) exist but are less common and may dry slower.

If you buy it

Wash gently by hand in cool water after use to extend life and reduce potential leaching of treatment chemicals; avoid machine washing and hot water, which can degrade polyurethane and release more additives. Replace the glove when synthetic leather shows cracking, peeling, or loss of grip, typically after 12-18 months of regular play. Store dry in a ventilated space; avoid prolonged sunlight exposure, which can accelerate polyurethane degradation and color fading.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Honma has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.