PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Hunza G Square Neck One Piece Swimsuit

Hunza G · Swimwear

Hunza G Square Neck One Piece Swimsuit

Bad

Avoid until brand reveals water-repellent coating chemistry; legacy finishes commonly contained PFAS.

Verdict · SkipPFAS risk dominates; nylon/spandex blend itself low-hazard if water-repellent coating chemistry disclosed. Brand silence is the problem.

This luxury nylon swimsuit features water-repellent treatment without any brand statement on PFAS content or alternatives. Premium swimwear has traditionally used perfluorinated coatings for durability.

The better-graded swap

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon blend (likely nylon/spandex) with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Hunza G Square Neck One Piece Swimsuit is made of, ingredients and materials

Hunza G's signature one-piece uses a nylon-spandex blend, a standard high-stretch swimwear base. The critical unknown is the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the fabric. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on PFAS chemistry (perfluorinated compounds) to repel water and chlorine; newer alternatives exist but require explicit manufacturer confirmation. Without disclosure, you cannot know if this garment carries legacy PFAS finishes.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-based resins are sometimes used in nylon finishing for wrinkle resistance or shape retention. Not confirmed for this product; lack of Oeko-Tex certification means no independent testing for residual formaldehyde.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Nylon-spandex blends shed microfibers in laundering. This is inherent to synthetic fiber swimwear and not brand-specific; shedding increases with wear and washing frequency. No evidence Hunza G's construction is worse than standard, but care and lifespan directly affect exposure.

70/ 100
⏳

Spandex degradation products

Spandex (elastane) degrades with heat, chlorine, and UV exposure. Degradation by-products are not well-characterized in consumer use; risk is minimized by avoiding heat and excess chlorine exposure. No specific data on Hunza G's spandex quality or durability vs. competitors.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Even newer non-PFAS water-repellent coating finishes (silicones, waxes, hybrid coatings) may release trace compounds into water or skin contact. Hunza G has not disclosed which finish type is used, making risk assessment impossible. This is the primary non-PFAS chemical concern for this product.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Azo dyes

Hunza G does not publicly disclose dye sourcing. Nylon readily accepts synthetic dyes; restricted azo dyes are banned in EU/many markets, but brand certification status is unclear. No recalls or adverse events reported.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Hunza G has not publicly disclosed its water-repellent coating chemistry or committed to PFAS-free finishes. The brand does not appear to hold third-party certifications (Oeko-Tex, Bluesign) that would independently verify synthetic coating safety. No recalls or formal complaints regarding chemical content have been reported in public databases, but silence on water-repellent coating sourcing is a material gap for a premium swimwear brand in an era of PFAS awareness.

How it compares in its category

Premium swimwear brands vary widely, some (e.g., Girlfriend Collective, Patagonia) explicitly certify PFAS-free construction; others remain opaque. Hunza G's price point and luxury positioning would support transparent sourcing but does not guarantee it. The Square Neck One Piece is marketed for durability and color retention, which historically meant aggressive finishing, a red flag if finishes are not explicitly verified as non-PFAS.

If you buy it

Rinse thoroughly before first wear to reduce any residual finish chemicals on the surface. Wash in cold water with mild detergent; avoid heat (hot water, dryers, direct sun for extended periods) which can degrade nylon and spandex, potentially releasing breakdown products. Replace after 2-3 years of regular use or when elastic loses recovery. If you have concerns about water-repellent coating chemistry, contact the brand directly requesting water-repellent coating supplier and formulation data before purchase.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Hunza G has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Swimwear

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine
Solid & Striped Taylor One Piece Seersucker Plaid

Solid & Striped

Taylor One Piece Seersucker Plaid

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Cotton/cotton-blend seersucker plaid
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and colorfast stability

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

adidas Women's Mexicana Florals Tie-Back Swimsuit

Adidas

Women's Mexicana Florals Tie-Back Swimsuit

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Polyester/nylon swimsuit fabric, likely uncoated or standard finish
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More swimwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.